<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>News Watch &#187; Tim Profeta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/author/climatepost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com</link>
	<description>National Geographic News Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:00:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2-alpha</generator>
		<item>
		<title>With Oklahoma Tornado, Questions Swirl about Climate Change Link</title>
		<link>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/05/23/with-oklahoma-tornado-questions-swirl-about-climate-change-link/</link>
		<comments>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/05/23/with-oklahoma-tornado-questions-swirl-about-climate-change-link/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 21:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Profeta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NatGeo News Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ernest Moniz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gina McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tornado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/?p=94177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hours after a powerful tornado tore through an Oklahoma suburb, killing dozens, some renewed speculation about such storms’ connection to climate change. In recent years, researchers have been working to assess what causes these storms and whether manmade global warming could be affecting them. Plain geography is a factor. Moore, Oklahoma, is in the middle of what is known as Tornado Alley—an area where cold,&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hours after a <a href="http://www.universetoday.com/102282/oklahoma-tornado-on-may-20-2013-as-seen-from-space/">powerful tornado</a> tore through an <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/21/before-after-oklahoma-tornado-pictures_n_3313690.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000008">Oklahoma suburb</a>, killing dozens, some renewed <a href="http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2013/05/oklahoma_tornado_quickly_renew.html">speculation</a> about such storms’ <a href="http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/21/a-survival-plan-for-americas-tornado-danger-zone/?smid=tw-share">connection</a> to climate change. In recent years, researchers have been working to assess what causes these storms and <a href="http://www.climatecentral.org/news/making-sense-of-the-moore-tornado-in-a-climate-context-16021">whether manmade</a> global warming could be affecting them.</p>
<p>Plain geography is a factor. Moore, Oklahoma, is in the middle of what is known as <a href="http://www.rferl.org/content/what-is-a-tornado-explainer/24992789.html">Tornado Alley</a>—an area where cold, dry air from Canada and the Rockies meets warm, moist air from the Gulf of Mexico to create the <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=d34vj1YSrbAC&amp;pg=PA120&amp;dq=tornado+alley&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=jriaUct8jeWKAtqYgPAG&amp;ved=0CGEQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false">unstable conditions</a> that cause tornados. Although, generally, <a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-05/fyi-could-climate-change-cause-more-tornadoes">researchers agree</a> that climate change will increase the likelihood of extreme weather events, they <a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/climate-weather/stories/is-tornado-intensity-increasing">cannot say for sure</a> whether there is a <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/22/us/climate-change-tornado/">connection between</a> climate change and tornadoes.</p>
<p>“The short answer is, we have no idea,” <a href="http://science.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/20/18382215-curse-or-coincidence-scientists-study-tornado-alleys-past-and-future?lite">said Michael Wehner</a>, a climate researcher at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, noting he’s studying the issue and is optimistic about achieving a more definitive answer. “The reason I’m optimistic that we can get somewhere on this is that supercomputing technology is driving this very hard. We’re just getting into the sweet spot for these kinds of issues, with the largest mainframes that money can buy.”</p>
<p><a href="http://ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX/images/uploads/SREX-SPMbrochure_FINAL.pdf">Studies</a>, the <a href="http://blog.chron.com/sciguy/2013/05/is-climate-change-making-tornadoes-worse/"><i>Houston Chronicle</i></a><i> </i>cites<i>,</i> indicate no evidence at this time to link tornado activity to climate change. According to the National Weather Service, tornadoes <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/05/tornadoes-in-america-the-oklahoma-disaster-in-context/276063/">aren’t getting more frequent</a>, but more accounts of these storms are being made available for public consumption.</p>
<p><b>Vote Expedites Northern Leg of the Keystone XL Pipeline</b></p>
<p>The House <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/301347-house-advances-keystone-bill-in-bipartisan-vote">approved legislation</a> Wednesday to <a href="http://www.politico.com/morningenergy/0513/morningenergy10742.html">expedite</a> construction of the <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/daily/graphic-keystone-xl-more-than-a-pipeline-20130521">Keystone XL oil sands pipeline’s</a> northern leg by <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/100759858">eliminating</a> the need for a presidential permit and <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/obama-opposes-gop-bill-keystone-xl-oil-pipeline">requiring no additional environmental studies</a>. The vote was largely symbolic, <i>U.S. News and World Report</i> <a href="http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/05/21/keystone-xl-bill-heads-to-house-vote-but-is-largely-symbolic">wrote</a>, noting that experts say it has virtually no chance of surviving a Senate vote. The White House has also threatened to <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/legislative/sap/113/saphr3r_20130521.pdf">veto the bill</a>, claiming it “prevents thorough consideration of the complex issues that could have serious security, safety, environmental, and other ramifications.”</p>
<p>So far, the Canadian government has <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/may/16/canadian-government-doubles-advertising-spend-tar-sands">nearly doubled</a> spending—reaching $16.5 million—to promote the pipeline. But it seems Americans are more aware of climate change than the Keystone XL pipeline project, according to a <a href="http://www.eenews.net/greenwire/2013/05/21/stories/1059981552">new poll</a> <i>(subscription)</i> by Yale and George Mason universities.</p>
<p><b>Moniz Vows to Review LNG Export Data, Energy Efficiency in New Role</b></p>
<p>In his first <a href="http://energy.gov/articles/energy-secretary-moniz-promises-focus-energy-efficiency">official speech</a> after <a href="http://www.kndo.com/story/22324457/dr-ernest-moniz-sworn-in-as-13th-energy-of-secretary">being sworn</a> in as Energy Secretary, Ernest Moniz indicated he plans to delay any final decisions on applications to export liquefied natural gas <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2013-05-21/moniz-sworn-in-as-energy-secretary">until he reviews data</a> showing what impact exports would have on domestic supplies and prices. The boom in domestic production of the resource has lowered prices and stirred debate regarding exports. Moniz doesn’t plan to order <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/301101-new-energy-secretary-moniz-vows-review-of-gas-exports">new studies</a> right now. Rather, he’ll review what is already out there—including a <a href="http://energy.gov/fe/services/natural-gas-regulation/lng-export-study">study commissioned</a> in 2012 by the Department of Energy.</p>
<p>He saw <a href="http://www.power-eng.com/articles/2013/05/monizs-energy-department-will-focus-on-energy-efficiency.html">efficiency</a> as a vital part of <a href="http://www.greatenergychallengeblog.com/2013/05/21/new-energy-secretary-moniz-stresses-efficiency-to-start/">meeting</a> the country’s climate and energy challenges, noting he plans to advance a large <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/301033-moniz-vows-to-help-advance-big-efficiency-bill-sees-real-chance">bipartisan energy efficiency bill</a> moving through Congress.</p>
<p>“Efficiency is going to be a big focus as we go forward,” <a href="http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/ernest-moniz-gives-his-first-speech-as-energy-secretary">Moniz said</a>. “I just don’t see the solutions to our biggest energy and environmental challenges without a very big demand-side response. That’s why it’s important to move this way, way up in our priorities.”</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Gina McCarthy, President Barack <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-s-becker/epa-nominee-obama_b_3302995.html">Obama’s pick</a> to head the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, has <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/log-jam-in-agency-confirmations-1.13033">waited longer than any other nominee for U.S. Senate confirmation</a>—more than 20 days longer than Michael Leavitt in 2003.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://climatepost.org/">The Climate Post</a> </em><em>offers a rundown of the week in climate and energy news. It is produced each Thursday</em><em> </em><em>by</em><em> </em><em><a href="http://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/">Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions.</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/05/23/with-oklahoma-tornado-questions-swirl-about-climate-change-link/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon Dioxide Milestone Revised by NOAA</title>
		<link>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/05/16/carbon-dioxide-milestone-revised-by-noaa/</link>
		<comments>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/05/16/carbon-dioxide-milestone-revised-by-noaa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Profeta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NatGeo News Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydraulic fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainforest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/?p=93312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) announced last week that carbon dioxide concentrations at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii surpassed the milestone 400 parts per million for a sustained period. NOAA has since revised the figure—on the basis of computer analysis—saying its May 9 readings actually remained fractions of a point below the historic level, coming in at&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) <a href="http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/news/7074.html">announced</a> last week that carbon dioxide concentrations at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii <a href="http://blogs.courier-journal.com/watchdogearth/2013/05/10/blowing-past-the-400-ppm-milestone-climate-fears-intensify/">surpassed</a> the milestone 400 parts per million for a sustained period. NOAA has since <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-carbon-dioxide-400-20130513,0,7196126.story">revised the figure</a>—on the basis of computer analysis—saying its May 9 readings actually remained fractions of a point below the historic level, coming in at 399.89. A second monitoring program run by the Scripps Institute for Oceanography, <i>The New York Times</i> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/14/science/earth/crucial-carbon-dioxide-reading-revised-downward.html?ref=earth&amp;_r=0">reports</a>, continues to show a level of 400.8 parts per million for the same period. The numbers, <a href="http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2013/05/scientists-thoughts-on-400-parts-per-million">scientists said</a>, are a <a href="http://www2.ucar.edu/atmosnews/opinion/9574/five-things-know-about-carbon-dioxide">reminder</a> of the long-term trend in greenhouse gases.</p>
<p>“The last time in the Earth’s history when we saw similar levels of CO<sub>2 </sub>in the atmosphere was probably about 4.5 million years ago when the world was warmer on average by three or four degrees Celsius than it is today,” said Professor <a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/environment/global-co2-reaches-400-ppm">Sir Brian Hoskins</a>, director of the Grantham Institute for Climate Change at the Imperial College London. “There was no apparent ice sheet on Greenland, sea levels were much higher, and the world was a very different place.”</p>
<p>A <a href="http://ncadac.globalchange.gov/">first draft</a> of the congressionally mandated National Climate Assessment shares more data on how the climate is changing; the final version is due out in early 2014. Among the <a href="http://www.yaleclimatemediaforum.org/2013/05/national-climate-assessment-plenty-of-grist-for-the-media-mill/">highlights</a>: the average temperature in the U.S. has increased by nearly 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit since 1895, and sea levels are expected to rise another 1 to 4 feet this century. <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-common-plants-animals-threatened-by-climate-change-20130512,0,707585.story">Another study</a>, which looked at 50,000 <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/12/us-climate-species-idUSBRE94B09P20130512">common animals and plants</a>, says climate change <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/may/13/animals-species-climate-change">could lead</a> to the loss of more than half of these plants and one third of the animals.</p>
<p><b>McCarthy Gets Go Ahead</b></p>
<p>After <a href="http://www.eenews.net/stories/1059981023">boycotting</a> the first hearing a week ago, Republican lawmakers <a href="http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.PressReleases&amp;ContentRecord_id=ae0328d5-ab19-310a-082c-d97087587125&amp;Region_id=&amp;Issue_id=">agreed to show up</a> to vote today on whether to move the nomination for Gina McCarthy to head the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to the full Senate. The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee voted <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/05/16/3400928/senate-committee-backs-epa-nominee.html">10-8</a> along party lines to move McCarthy <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/16/gina-mccarthy-senate-epa_n_3286749.html">forward</a> in the process. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/16/us-usa-epa-mccarthy-idUSBRE94F0TF20130516">No date</a> has been set for the floor vote, and Sen. Roy Blunt still maintains a hold on McCarthy’s nomination <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/16/us-usa-epa-mccarthy-idUSBRE94F0TF20130516">over a dispute</a> to repair the levee system on the Mississippi River.</p>
<p><b>Natural Gas Exports, Ethanol Topics of Debate</b></p>
<p>The boom in domestic production of natural gas has lowered prices and stirred debate regarding the export of the resource. A decision by the Obama administration on whether <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-13/obama-seen-expanding-natural-gas-exports-on-production-records.html">to approve applications</a> for some 20 natural gas export terminals could come in “weeks and not months,” David Leiter, president of ML Strategies LLC, told <i>Bloomberg</i>. If all were approved, facilities could ship nearly 41 percent of the total U.S. production of natural gas this year and lead to <a href="http://www.chron.com/news/texas/article/Plans-to-export-US-natural-gas-stir-debate-4509015.php">further increases</a> in hydraulic fracturing. This week, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee held the first of a <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/daily/natural-gas-exports-loom-large-over-washington-20130514">series of forums</a> on natural gas. Up <a href="http://www.energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/hearings">next week</a>: exports.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, a new House bill seeks to <a href="http://www.chron.com/business/article/Bill-would-let-natural-gas-based-ethanol-qualify-4516475.php">modify the renewable fuel standard (RFS)</a> to let natural gas-based ethanol qualify as a renewable. Currently, the <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2013/05/15/5422352/broad-national-energy-coalition.html">rule limits</a> eligible feedstocks to renewable sources such as corn, soybeans and switchgrass.</p>
<p><b>Rainforest Losses Could Affect Energy Output, Agriculture</b></p>
<p>Two new studies in the journals <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/05/09/1215331110"><i>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</i></a> and <a href="http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/"><i>Environmental Research Letters</i></a> look at threats to the Amazon rainforest. The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/14/science/earth/study-finds-loss-of-rain-forests-can-deplete-hydropower.html?smid=tw-share&amp;_r=1&amp;">first finds</a> extensive deforestation will leave less water in nearby rivers to run the <a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-05/15/hydropower-amazon">hydropower dams</a> that countries such as Brazil are investing billions of dollars to create. Scientists estimate that Brazil’s controversial <a href="http://www.economist.com/news/americas/21577073-having-spent-heavily-make-worlds-third-biggest-hydroelectric-project-greener-brazil">Bel Monte Dam</a>—<a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=amazon-be-dammed-deforestation-undermines-viability-brazil-hydropower&amp;WT.mc_id=SA_sharetool_Twitter">one of</a> the world’s largest hydropower projects—could deliver <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22513233">roughly 30 percent less power</a> if forest loss continues. The loss is equivalent to the energy consumption of 4 million Brazilians.</p>
<p>Making more land available in the Amazon rainforest for farming could actually produce fewer “wins” for the agricultural sector, according to the <i>Environmental Research Letters</i> work. Why? Loss of trees not only reduces the capacity of the Amazon to act as a <a href="http://www.climatecentral.org/news/amazon-may-lose-65-percent-of-land-biomass-by-2060-15980">natural carbon sink</a>, but also increases temperature and decreases precipitation. “These climate feedbacks, usually ignored in previous studies, impose reduction in precipitation that would lead agricultural expansion in Amazonia to become self-defeating: the more agriculture expands, the less productive it becomes,” researchers said. <a href="http://americablog.com/2013/05/cool-time-lapse-earths-climate-changing.html">Google and Carnegie Mellon</a> share a <a href="http://americablog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Surui_400.gif">time lapse look</a> at deforestation’s effect from 1984 to 2012.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://climatepost.org/">The Climate Post</a> </em><em>offers a rundown of the week in climate and energy news. It is produced each Thursday</em><em> </em><em>by</em><em> </em><em><a href="http://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/">Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions.</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/05/16/carbon-dioxide-milestone-revised-by-noaa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arctic Experiencing More Than Just Melt</title>
		<link>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/05/09/arctic-experiencing-more-than-just-melt/</link>
		<comments>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/05/09/arctic-experiencing-more-than-just-melt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 19:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Profeta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NatGeo News Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gina McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto Protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean acidification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/?p=92377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carbon dioxide emissions are soaking into Arctic waters and affecting the chemistry of the ocean, a new report by the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program shows. Increasing carbon dioxide emissions and freshwater runoff challenge the ocean’s ability to neutralize acidification—an imbalance caused by absorption of the greenhouse gas from the air. The study said the Arctic’s cold water makes it more vulnerable to&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carbon dioxide emissions are soaking into Arctic waters and affecting the chemistry of the ocean, a new <a href="http://www.cicero.uio.no/images/AOAKeyFindings.pdf">report</a> by the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program shows. <a href="http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/20130506/scientists-warn-carbon-dioxide-emissions-speeding-arctic-ocean-acidification">Increasing carbon dioxide emissions</a> and freshwater runoff challenge the ocean’s ability to neutralize acidification—an imbalance caused by absorption of the greenhouse gas from the air. The study said the Arctic’s <a href="http://www.weather.com/news/science/environment/arctic-ocean-acidification-co2-20130506">cold water</a> makes it <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/story/2013/05/08/north-ocean-acidification.html">more vulnerable</a> to absorbing carbon dioxide, lowering pH levels and thereby increasing acidity.<b></b></p>
<p>“We have already passed critical thresholds,” said <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22408341">Richard Bellerby</a>, report chairman. “Even if we stop emissions now, acidification will last tens of thousands of years.”</p>
<p>In fact, the <a href="http://www.france24.com/en/20130506-ocean-acidification">average acidity</a> of surface ocean waters is now roughly 30 percent higher than at the start of the Industrial Revolution. This month, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/apr/29/global-carbon-dioxide-levels">experts predict</a> carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere to reach 400 parts per million for a sustained period of time—<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/may/07/arctic-threat-ocean-acidification">40 percent more</a> carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than before that revolution began. Among the report’s <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2013/05/arctic-ocean-rapidly-getting-more-acidic">other key findings</a>: Arctic marine ecosystems are highly likely to undergo significant change, acidification may contribute to the alteration of fish species, acidity is not uniform across the Arctic, and acidity rise is the result of an uptake in carbon dioxide emissions from human activities.</p>
<p><b>Negotiating Climate Policy</b></p>
<p>Nations gathering for the week-long climate talks in Bonn, Germany, moved closer to solidifying details for a 2015 international climate agreement that would take effect in 2020. Although there were no breakthroughs in <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/environment/climate-change/bonn-climate-talks-fail-to-close-china-us-divide-20130506-2j20a.html">bridging the divide</a> between the U.S. and China, participants began to <a href="/www.businessgreen.com/bg/analysis/2266431/nine-lessons-from-the-bonn-climate-talks">lay the groundwork</a> for progress at November’s climate summit in Poland. More specifically, a U.S. proposal to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/may/08/emissions-plan-global-climate-talks">move away</a> from a successor to the 1997 Kyoto Protocol and let countries draft their own emissions reduction plans gained support at the meeting. The current level of pledges to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is <a href="http://www.trust.org/item/20130502135918-xnfk2/?source%20=%20hpbreaking">far too low</a>, says U.N. Climate Change Secretariat Christiana Figueres. “The challenge for the 2015 agreement is precisely to bridge the gap,” Figueres said. “The process is not on track with respect to the demands of science.”</p>
<p>In the European Union, politicians announced plans for a “<a href="http://eenews.net/public/climatewire/2013/05/08/2">rescue attempt</a>” centered on the union’s carbon trading system, which is designed to <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/business/carbon-economy/europe-faces-seachange-against-climate-policies-20130507-2j47i.html">provide incentives to industry to reduce</a> greenhouse gas emissions. The European Union Parliament rejected a proposal to backload the auctioning of credits within the <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/16/eu-ets-vote-idUSL5N0D337720130416">system last month</a>, a plan that would have removed a surplus of emissions permits from the system dubbed the world’s largest carbon market. A <a href="http://www.rtcc.org/eu-to-vote-on-carbon-market-reforms-in-july/">second vote</a> determining whether to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-07/europe-s-carbon-market-fix-to-be-voted-in-parliament-in-july.html">withhold carbon permits</a> from the oversupplied market to address the current imbalance is expected by July.</p>
<p><b>Obama’s Energy and Environment Team Takes Shape</b></p>
<p>With Ernest Moniz—a Massachusetts Institute of Technology physics professor—now <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/19/us/politics/senate-committee-approves-ernest-j-moniz-energy-secretary-nominee.html?_r=0">confirmed</a> as the <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/senate-energy-committee-gives-moniz-thumbs-up-90303.html">Energy Secretary</a>, the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works was <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/297525-senate-committee-sets-vote-for-epa-nominee">scheduled to vote</a> on whether U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) nominee Gina McCarthy would get <a href="http://eponline.com/articles/2013/05/08/epa-nominee-gets-senate-hearing-tomorrow.aspx">her turn</a> in front of the full Senate. All eight <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-09/senate-republicans-block-committee-vote-on-obama-epa-nominee-1-.html">Republican lawmakers</a> on the committee <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/senate-republicans-block-confirmation-epa-nominee-131708967.html">boycotted the hearing</a> on the vote today, contending that McCarthy hasn’t answered several questions fully. At least two Republicans were <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/republicans-boycott-gina-mccarthy-vote-91124.html">needed</a> to move ahead with a vote, according to committee rules.</p>
<p>“As you know, all Republicans on our EPW committee have asked EPA to honor five very reasonable and basic requests in conjunction with the nomination of Gina McCarthy, which focus on openness and transparency,” the <a href="http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/05/09/republicans-stage-boycott-of-obama-epa-nominee-gina-mccarthy">lawmakers wrote</a> in a letter to Committee Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.). “While you have allowed EPA adequate time to fully respond before any mark-up on the nomination, EPA has stonewalled on four of the five categories. Because of this, no Republican member of the committee will attend [Thursday]’s mark-up if it is held.” Chairwoman Boxer <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/republicans-boycott-gina-mccarthy-vote-91124.html?hp=t1_3">vowed</a> to move McCarthy’s nomination through the committee, even if it required her to change the committee rules to remove the requirement for Republican attendance for a quorum.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, recently confirmed Interior Secretary Sally Jewell made her <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/298029-overnight-energy-new-interior-chief-to-face-senate">first appearance</a>, since <a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2013/04/10/sally-jewell-wins-confirmation-interior-secretary/rHHxD4KnTKNsOeVffUpUoI/story.html">winning confirmation</a> last month, to defend the department’s proposed fiscal <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2014/assets/interior.pdf">2014 budget</a>.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://climatepost.org/">The Climate Post</a> </em><em>offers a rundown of the week in climate and energy news. It is produced each Thursday</em><em> </em><em>by</em><em> </em><em><a href="http://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/">Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions.</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/05/09/arctic-experiencing-more-than-just-melt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Oil Reserves Higher Than Previously Thought</title>
		<link>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/05/02/u-s-oil-reserves-higher-than-previously-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/05/02/u-s-oil-reserves-higher-than-previously-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 20:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Profeta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NatGeo News Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydraulic fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/?p=91528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a new U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) assessment, two formations in the central United States hold three times the amount of natural gas and two times the amount of oil than the federal government previously estimated. Concentrated in the Dakotas and Montana, the Bakken and Three Forks formations are expected to hold 7.4 billion barrels of recoverable oil and&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a new U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) assessment, two formations in the central United States <a href="http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Energy-Resources/2013/05/01/US-increases-oil-gas-reserve-estimate/UPI-90521367406453/">hold three times</a> the amount of natural gas and two times the amount of oil than the federal government <a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2013/3013/fs2013-3013.pdf">previously estimated</a>. Concentrated in the Dakotas and Montana, the Bakken and Three Forks formations <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/daily/the-u-s-has-much-much-more-gas-and-oil-than-we-thought-20130430">are expected</a> to hold 7.4 billion barrels of recoverable oil and 6.7 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. The Three Forks formation, which alone contains 3.73 billion barrels of oil, was not included in the last USGS assessment in 2008—helping to explain <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/30/usa-energy-bakken-idUSL2N0DH26020130430">the large jump</a>.</p>
<p>“These world-class formations contain even more energy resource potential than previously understood, which is important information as we continue to reduce our nation’s dependence on foreign sources of oil,” <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/northern-plains-site-has-twice-as-much-oil-as-previously-thought-interior-says/2013/04/30/16e0a436-b1cf-11e2-9a98-4be1688d7d84_story.html">said</a> Interior Secretary Sally Jewell.</p>
<p>The same week, Jewell announced the U.S. Department of Interior will release revised, draft rules regulating hydraulic fracturing operations that have increasingly recovered tough-to-reach fossil fuel sources—particularly <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2013/05/fracking-boom-north-dakota-here-stay">in North Dakota</a>. The rules would only apply to hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling on public lands and would establish new requirements for disclosure of chemicals and well integrity. The draft is expected in the <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/296973-fracking-rules-coming-in-weeks-says-interior-chief-jewell">coming weeks</a>.</p>
<p><b>Senate Votes on Clean Energy</b></p>
<p>A House committee in North Carolina’s state legislature last week <a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/04/24/2847114/nc-house-committee-defeats-proposal.html#emlnl=Afternoon_Update">voted against</a> a bill <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-24/north-carolina-rejects-cuts-to-renewable-energy-mandates.html">to repeal</a> the state’s Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard (REPS). However, a Senate Committee this week <a href="http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/05/01/4015813/nc-senate-panel-pushes-through.html">pushed through</a> the bill, which would keep the mandate <a href="http://www.wect.com/story/22132869/nc-senate-panel-pushes-through-renewables-repeal">at 3 percent</a>, but eliminate it later on.</p>
<p>The REPS enacted by a 2007 North Carolina law had no expiration and, in addition to the overall renewable requirements, uniquely required utilities to get 0.07 percent of their electricity from hog waste now and 0.20 percent by 2018. So far, little of the set-aside for hog waste-derived energy has been met. A <a href="http://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/climate/spatial-economic-optimization-study-swine-waste-derived-biogas-infrastructure-design#.UYFzgaKsiSo">new study</a> by the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions and the Duke Carbon Offsets Initiative provides a first step toward an informed strategy to increase swine gas energy production. Using a comparative modeling analysis considering individual and centralized <a href="http://wunc.org/post/connecting-hog-farms-pipelines-could-streamline-methane-gas-energy">approaches</a>, the report finds that injecting biogas collected from an optimized network of farms into the natural gas pipeline could be a cost-effective approach to meeting state REPS.</p>
<p><b>As Carbon Dioxide Levels Rise, International Climate Negotiations Begin</b></p>
<p>As early as this month, carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere are expected to reach a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/29/400-ppm-atmospheric-co2_n_3179617.html">new milestone</a>, rising above 400 parts per million for a sustained period of time. Carbon dioxide levels in excess of 400 parts per million <a href="http://bluemoon.ucsd.edu/co2_400/mlo_one_week.png">have already been recorded</a> at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii, but they tend to fluctuate hourly. The <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2013/04/30/putting-the-400-ppm-co2-thing-in-perspective/">milestone is significant</a> because it illustrates how dramatically humans have altered the atmosphere in a few generations, <a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/climate-weather/blogs/earths-carbon-dioxide-levels-to-hit-400-ppm">says <i>Mother Nature Network</i></a>. In 1988, atmospheric carbon dioxide was <a href="http://blog.timesunion.com/weather/400-ppm/2791/">about 350 parts per million</a>.</p>
<p>“I wish it weren’t true but it looks like the world is going to blow through the 400 ppm level without losing a beat,” said <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/apr/29/global-carbon-dioxide-levels">Ralph Keeling</a>, a geologist with the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. “At this pace we’ll hit a 450 ppm within a few decades. Each year, the concentration of CO2 at Mauna Loa rises and falls in a sawtooth fashion, with the next year higher than the year before. The peak of the sawtooth typically comes in May. If the CO2 levels don’t top 400 ppm in May 2013, they almost certainly will next year.”</p>
<p><i>The Washington Post</i> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/04/22/on-earth-day-where-does-obamas-environmental-record-stand/">looks at</a> President Obama’s record on climate and environment so far. In <a href="http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/bonn-climate-change-talks-going-surprisingly-well-say-delegates-1.1379732">Bonn</a>, groups gathered for a week-long meeting <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/apr/29/un-climate-talks-bonn">to focus on the</a> “scope, design and structure” of the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-02/un-envoys-consider-2050-carbon-target-in-talks-on-climate-deal.html">2015 climate agreement</a> that would take effect in 2020. This agreement would replace the Kyoto Protocol, which was adopted in 1997 to limit pollution.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://climatepost.org/">The Climate Post</a> </em><em>offers a rundown of the week in climate and energy news. It is produced each Thursday</em><em> </em><em>by</em><em> </em><em><a href="http://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/">Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions.</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/05/02/u-s-oil-reserves-higher-than-previously-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Union Rejects Carbon Market Solution</title>
		<link>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/04/18/european-union-rejects-carbon-market-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/04/18/european-union-rejects-carbon-market-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 21:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Profeta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NatGeo News Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fukushima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/?p=89859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European Union Parliament rejected a proposal to backload the auctioning of credits within its Emissions Trading Scheme this week. The proposed “backloading” plan would have removed a surplus of emissions permits from the world’s largest carbon market—potentially saving it from collapse and making fossil fuels more expensive for utilities and factories to burn. The surplus, partly a result of the&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The European Union Parliament <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/16/eu-ets-vote-idUSL5N0D337720130416">rejected</a> a proposal to backload the auctioning of credits within its Emissions Trading Scheme this week. The <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/apr/16/meps-reject-reform-emissions-trading">proposed</a> “backloading” plan would have removed a surplus of emissions permits from the world’s largest carbon market—potentially saving it from collapse and making fossil fuels <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/eu-lawmakers-voting-on-tightening-cap-and-trade-system-to-make-carbon-pollution-more-expensive/2013/04/16/963b578a-a67b-11e2-9e1c-bb0fb0c2edd9_story.html">more expensive</a> for utilities and factories to burn. The surplus, partly a result of the recession, had driven carbon prices down from <a href="http://science.time.com/2013/04/17/if-carbon-markets-cant-work-in-europe-can-they-work-anywhere/">25 euros</a> in 2008 to just 5 euros per ton in February. As a result, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/18/business/energy-environment/18iht-green18.html?_r=0">the permits</a> were no longer doing their intended job of encouraging manufacturers and utilities to invest in cleaner fuels and new technology. Announcement of the ruling sent <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2013/s3739451.htm">permit prices</a> to their <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/Carbon-Falls-Most-Ever-After-EU-Parliament-4441004.php">lowest yet</a> and dealt a blow to partner Australia. The country <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/climate/eu-carbon-collapse-deals-blow-to-australia/story-e6frg6xf-1226622388327">intends to link</a> to the EU carbon market in <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-04-16/australia-cutting-carbon-revenue-forecast-amid-eu-price-collapse">2015</a>.</p>
<p>“We will continue with our plans to link with the European emissions trading scheme from 1 July, 2015,” said Australia Climate Minister <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-17/australia-cutting-carbon-revenue-forecast-amid-eu-price-collapse.html">Greg Combet</a>. “But this year’s budget, as is usual practice by Treasury, will include a revised forecast for a carbon price in 2015-16.”</p>
<p>On Wednesday, EU Commissioner for Climate Action Connie Hedegaard <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/apr/17/europe-climate-chief-vow-save-emissions-trading">vowed to fight</a> to save the system through new measures that include restricting rights to carbon permits and allowing for reviews of the number of permits companies receive for free.</p>
<p><b>EPA Says U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Declined</b></p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/usinventoryreport.html">new report</a> by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) suggests greenhouse gas emissions in the United States dropped 1.6 percent from 2010 to 2011. Since 2005, that number has <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/greenliving/EPA-greenhouse-gas-emissions-report-A-decline-in-2011.html">decreased 6.9 percent</a>. The agency attributed the drop to factors such as <a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/04/16/us-emissions-fell-1-6-in-2011/">improvements</a> in vehicle fuel efficiency and mild winter weather.</p>
<p>Electricity <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/regwatch/energyenvironment/293959-epa-reports-decline-in-greenhouse-gas-emissions">generation</a> by power plants was termed the largest source of emissions, accounting for 33 percent of the 2011 total, according to the report. The EPA missed an April 13 deadline to issue a final rule limiting greenhouse gas emissions from new power plants, instead <a href="http://www.power-eng.com/news/2013/04/16/epa-delays-rule-limiting-new-power-plant-emissions.html">delaying release indefinitely</a> on Friday. In its <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-epa-delays-limiting-emissions-20130415,0,2892842.story">draft form</a>, the rule would have made building new coal plants difficult. <i>The Washington Post</i> indicated that the EPA will alter the rule to better <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/04/12/its-official-epa-delays-climate-rule-for-new-power-plants/">withstand legal challenge</a>, including potentially establishing separate standards for gas-fired and coal-fired plants.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, little <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-iea-renewable-energy-stalled-20130417,0,6043134.story?track=rss">progress</a> has been made to reduce the carbon content of the world’s energy supply over the last two decades, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). In its <a href="http://www.iea.org/publications/TCEP_web.pdf">third annual report</a> tracking clean energy progress, the IEA <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22183232">found</a> the resurgence of coal counters many of the greenhouse gas benefits of clean energy production. “The drive to clean up the world’s energy system has stalled,” said IEA Executive Director <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/294393-international-energy-agency-progress-toward-low-carbon-energy-stalled">Maria van der Hoeven</a>. “Despite much talk by world leaders, and despite a boom in renewable energy over the last decade, the average unit of energy produced today is basically as dirty as it was 20 years ago.” Renewables are a <a href="http://www.power-eng.com/articles/2013/04/renewables-are-bright-spot-in-bleak-low-carbon-outlook.html">bright spot</a> in the data, which reveal that solar and wind technologies grew by 42 and 19 percent, respectively, from 2011 to 2012.</p>
<p><b>Nuclear Leak Prompts Review, New Guidelines</b></p>
<p>The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/iaea-inspecting-decommissioning-process-of-crippled-japan-nuke-plant-amid-recent-glitches/2013/04/15/af74c132-a586-11e2-9e1c-bb0fb0c2edd9_story.html">begun reviewing</a> the decommissioning process for Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, the site of a 2011 nuclear meltdown following a tsunami. <a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2013/apr/16/as-japan-nuclear/">Multiple leaks</a> have been <a href="http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS_Pits_pose_problems_at_Fukushima_1504131.html">detected</a> at the plant, and the IAEA will be <a href="http://www.npr.org/2013/04/17/177566629/iaea-team-probes-fukushimas-radioactive-water">analyzing</a> the melted reactors and radiation levels.</p>
<p>The EPA, meanwhile, has been prompted by the disaster <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/15/science/earth/new-rules-for-us-nuclear-disaster-response.html?_r=1&amp;">to rewrite rules</a> to enlarge the focus of U.S. nuclear disaster response beyond immediate emergency response to long-term cleanup efforts. A <a href="http://www.epa.gov/radiation/docs/er/pag-manual-interim-public-comment-4-2-2013.pdf">new draft</a> of recommended procedures will address the duration of evacuations, limits to radiation exposure over time and other concerns.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://climatepost.org/">The Climate Post</a> </em><em>offers a rundown of the week in climate and energy news. It is produced each Thursday</em><em> </em><em>by</em><em> </em><em><a href="http://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/">Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions.</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/04/18/european-union-rejects-carbon-market-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moniz, McCarthy Face Questions at Senate Confirmation Hearings</title>
		<link>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/04/11/moniz-mccarthy-face-questions-at-senate-confirmation-hearings/</link>
		<comments>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/04/11/moniz-mccarthy-face-questions-at-senate-confirmation-hearings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Profeta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NatGeo News Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ernest Moniz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gina McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/?p=88978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate confirmation hearings for Ernest Moniz and Gina McCarthy—President Barack Obama’s appointees to oversee the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)—began this week. For Moniz, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology physicist, committee grilling started Tuesday. Natural gas exports were a popular topic throughout Moniz’s hearing—signaling his likely support for exports as a way to combat climate change. With&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/292261-the-week-ahead-energy-epa-picks-face-lawmakers">confirmation hearings</a> for <a href="http://www.npr.org/2013/04/09/176713154/energy-secretary-nominee-dodges-question-on-gas-exports">Ernest Moniz</a> and <a href="http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Choose&amp;Hearing_id=d71fd4b6-ce77-3a98-46a0-fb02b0cae0ed">Gina McCarthy</a>—President Barack Obama’s appointees to oversee the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)—began this week.</p>
<p>For Moniz, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology physicist, committee grilling <a href="http://www.energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/hearings-and-business-meetings?ID=aa419f0a-4c25-4d05-980e-9ab889d207f0">started Tuesday</a>. Natural gas exports were a popular topic throughout Moniz’s <a href="/Users/em142/Desktop/%22We%20certainly%20want%20to%20make%20sure%20that%20we%20are%20using%20data%20that%20is%20relevant%20to%20the%20decision%20at%20hand,%22%20he%20said.">hearing</a>—signaling his <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/daily/natural-gas-exports-dominate-moniz-confirmation-hearing-20130409">likely support</a> for exports as a way to combat climate change. With some pressing, Moniz said he was open to reviewing a <a href="http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/gasregulation/LNGStudy.html">recent study</a> commissioned by the DOE that <a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/article/Moniz-fields-gas-export-questions-in-confirmation-4421987.php">found boosting</a> natural-gas exports would yield economic benefits for the United States. The analysis has <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-09/obama-nominee-pledges-case-by-case-review-of-gas-exports.html">received some criticism</a> for using outdated information and not fully examining the regional effects of exporting liquefied natural gas to markets in Europe and Asia. “We <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/09/ernie-moniz-climate-change_n_3046189.html">certainly want</a> to make sure that we are using data that is relevant to the decision at hand,” Moniz said.</p>
<p>While Moniz ducked questions about his <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/292649-doe-nominee-mum-on-carbon-tax">support of a carbon tax</a>, he did endorse Obama’s “all of the above” energy strategy and said he would <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/business/20130409_ap_monizbacksnaturalgasrevolution.html">push for renewable energy</a> if he was confirmed. “The increase in U.S. unconventional oil production, combined with increased vehicle efficiency, will continue to reduce American oil imports and reduce our trade deficit,” <a href="http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/04/09/obama-energy-department-pick-grilled-in-senate-confirmation-hearing">said Moniz</a>. “New technology development and deployment can and must further reduce the associated environmental footprint.”</p>
<p>In all, <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/smooth-hearing-for-energy-secretary-nominee-ernest-moniz-89840.html"><i>Politico</i> reports</a>, the hearing went <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2013/04/moniz-treated-gently-at-senate-c.html">smoothly</a> for the former DOE undersecretary, and Moniz looks to be on the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323550604578412782147471020.html">path for approval</a> <i>(subscription)</i> that may <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2013/0409/Ernest-Moniz-Where-would-he-take-Energy-Department">refocus</a> the department on its research and development roots. <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/293135-overnight-energy-epa-nominee-to-face-tough-crowd">McCarthy’s</a> hearing <a href="http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.ByMonth&amp;DisplayDate=04/11/13">began at 10:30 ET today</a> and focused on the <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-a-environment/293141-if-confirmed-mccarthy-should-avoid-pitfalls-of-past-at-epa">practices of the EPA</a> and the <a href="http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/11/17708098-coals-future-debated-at-confirmation-hearing-for-epa-nominee?lite">future of coal</a>. Republicans also <a href="http://www.eenews.net/eenewspm/2013/04/11/1">pushed her</a> <i>(subscription)</i> on <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/10/senators-press-mccarthy-on-unanswered-transparency-questions/">transparency</a>, the use of fictitious e-mails and the science of decision making.</p>
<p><a href="http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020752235_jewellconfirmationxml.html">Sally Jewell</a>, Obama’s pick for Interior Secretary, <a href="http://bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2013/04/10/sally-jewell-wins-confirmation-interior-secretary/rHHxD4KnTKNsOeVffUpUoI/story.html">won Senate</a> confirmation Wednesday.</p>
<p><b>Release of 2014 Budget Details Energy Priorities</b></p>
<p>The hearings—which <a href="http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/09/17658599-obama-looks-to-bypass-congress-with-appointments?lite">put the focus</a> on Obama’s regulatory agenda—come amid the <a href="http://www.freep.com/assets/freep/pdf/C4203661410.PDF">unveiling of Obama’s roughly $3.8 trillion budget</a> proposal, which <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/04/10/obama-budget-release/2069217/">shed light</a> on Obama’s <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=176800153">spending priorities</a>.</p>
<p>Set to begin October 1, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2013/04/10/department-of-interior-would-see-gains-under-obamas-budget/">budget</a> would <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/04/10/us-usa-fiscal-energy-idUKBRE9390QG20130410">boost clean-tech</a> spending by <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/sns-rt-us-usa-fiscal-energybre9390qg-20130410,0,6884610.story">40 percent</a> over current levels, cut net <a href="http://ens-newswire.com/2013/04/10/obamas-2014-budget-sets-new-energy-goals/">oil imports</a> in half by 2020 and seek to <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/04/10/budget-counts-on-energy-taxes-royalties/">eliminate</a> some tax breaks for the <a href="http://blog.chron.com/txpotomac/2013/04/obama-budget-will-target-oil-and-gas-industry-again/">oil and gas industry</a>. It also includes the $2 billion <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/292987-white-house-proposes-raising-fees-on-federal-energy-production">Energy Security Trust</a>, which aims to shift America’s cars and trucks off oil entirely by investing in research for advances in electricity, domestically produced natural gas and homegrown biofuels. Moniz hinted in his Tuesday confirmation hearing that the United States spends too little on energy research—a statement <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/04/09/three-charts-that-show-the-u-s-spends-too-little-on-energy-research/"><i>The Washington Post</i></a> examined in depth.</p>
<p><b>Climate Science in Education Standards Released this Week</b></p>
<p>New national science teaching guidelines, delving more deeply into the science of climate change, were <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-0410-schools-science-20130410,0,6820335.story">released</a> Tuesday. The <a href="http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards">Next Generation Science Standards</a> were developed by a consortium of 26 state governments and several groups representing scientists and teachers. The guidelines are the <a href="http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2013/04/09/28science_ep.h32.html?tkn=MURFAauW1LWLCGxjG0D4mO6P6tyKC64zfBvP&amp;cmp=clp-edweek">first set</a> of science standards to come out in 15 years and push more “critical thinking” and less memorization.</p>
<p>“There was never a debate about whether climate change would be in there,” said <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/mindshift/2013/04/new-science-standards-aim-to-relate-concepts-to-students-lives/">Heidi Schweingruber</a> of the National Research Council, one of the key organizations responsible for development of the guidelines. “It is a fundamental part of science, and so that’s what our work is based on, the scientific consensus.”</p>
<p>Although states are not required to adopt the rules, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/10/science/panel-calls-for-broad-changes-in-science-education.html?pagewanted=all">26 states</a>—including Arizona, California, Iowa, Kansas and New York—are considering doing so.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://climatepost.org/">The Climate Post</a> </em><em>offers a rundown of the week in climate and energy news. It is produced each Thursday</em><em> </em><em>by</em><em> </em><em><a href="http://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/">Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions.</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/04/11/moniz-mccarthy-face-questions-at-senate-confirmation-hearings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Proposes Clean Air Measures for Gasoline, Finalizes MATS Rules</title>
		<link>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/04/04/epa-proposes-clean-air-measures-for-gasoline-finalizes-mats-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/04/04/epa-proposes-clean-air-measures-for-gasoline-finalizes-mats-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 21:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Profeta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NatGeo News Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/?p=88072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Friday announced its proposed Tier 3 rules, which would reduce allowable amounts of sulfur in gasoline and help automobiles’ catalytic converters capture more pollutants. The new measures would reduce sulfur in gasoline by more than 60 percent—from the present average of 30 parts per million to 10 parts per million by 2017—an environmental benefit comparable to taking 33 million&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Friday <a href="http://www.epa.gov/otaq/tier3.htm">announced</a> its <a href="http://www.epa.gov/otaq/documents/tier3/tier3-nprm-20130329.pdf">proposed Tier 3 rules</a>, which would <a href="http://ens-newswire.com/2013/04/01/u-s-epa-raises-standards-for-cleaner-fuels-vehicles/">reduce</a> allowable amounts of sulfur in gasoline and help automobiles’ catalytic converters capture more pollutants. The new measures would <a href="http://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/detailedchart.pdf">reduce</a> sulfur in gasoline by <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/epa_hopes_to_tighten_emissions_standards_on_cars_ap/">more than 60 percent</a>—from the present average of <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/2013/03/29/epa-proposes-new-tier-3-emission-rules-cleaner-cars-gasoline/">30 parts per million</a> to 10 parts per million by 2017—an environmental benefit comparable to <a href="http://www.voanews.com/content/us-environment-protection-agency-to-require-cleaner-gas/1631129.html">taking 33 million cars off</a> the road. The EPA measure would increase the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/epa-proposes-requiring-cleaner-fuel-cars-in-the-us/2013/03/29/73df0966-987f-11e2-b68f-dc5c4b47e519_story.html">price of gasoline</a> by less than a penny per gallon but deliver up to <a href="http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/29/17518351-epa-proposes-tighter-fuel-emissions-standards-could-push-price-of-gas-higher?lite">$23 billion</a> in health benefits by 2030, according to <i>The Washington Post</i>. The <a href="http://www.memphisdailynews.com/news/2013/apr/1/cleaner-gas-rule-would-mean-higher-price-at-pump/">oil industry</a>, however, points to its own study, which suggests a 6 to 9 cent rise per gallon. Under the plan, fuel vapor emissions would drop to nearly zero, making it easier for the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/mar/29/obama-epa-rules-gasoline-car-emissions">auto industry</a> to meet tougher standards for new-car <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2013/04/01/auto-industry-epa-clean-gas-proposed-rules/2043397/">tailpipe emissions</a>.</p>
<p>The Tier 3 standards would yield gasoline sulfur levels <a href="http://www.epa.gov/otaq/documents/tier3/420f13018a.pdf">similar to levels</a> already being <a href="http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/04/epa-proposes-sulfur-cut-in-move-toward-california-gasoline.html">achieved</a> in California, Japan, South Korea and other countries in Europe and elsewhere, according to the EPA. The proposed rules will soon be open for public comment.</p>
<p>The EPA also issued the <a href="http://www.platts.com/RSSFeedDetailedNews/RSSFeed/ElectricPower/21887871">final rule</a> for the <a href="http://epa.gov/mats/pdfs/20130328notice.pdf">Mercury and Air Toxics Standards</a> (MATS) for new coal- and oil-fired power plants—<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/04/01/epa-finalizes-pollution-standards-for-new-power-plants/">raising limits</a> slightly from those laid out in December 2011. The final rule <a href="http://www.powermag.com/news/EPA-Updates-MATS-for-Power-Plants_5506.html">sets</a> mercury emissions limits at 0.003 pound/GWh, up from 0.0002 pound/GWh in the previous rule.</p>
<p>The agency also <a href="http://www.power-eng.com/content/dam/pe/online-articles/documents/2013/04/CSAPRappeal.pdf">filed a request</a> with the U.S. Supreme Court Monday <a href="http://www.power-eng.com/articles/2013/04/epa-wants-supreme-court-to-review-csapr-denial.html">to review</a> a decision by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals that <a href="http://www.power-eng.com/articles/2012/08/csapr-what-will-epa-do-now.html">tossed</a> out the Cross State Air Pollution Rule. The rule required cuts in soot and smog-forming pollution that blows across state lines.</p>
<p><b>Spills Thrust Keystone XL into the Spotlight</b></p>
<p>Two oil spills, one in Arkansas from a pipeline rupture and one in Minnesota from a train derailment, <a href="http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/04/01/recent-oil-spills-could-trip-up-keystone-xl-approval">stirred</a> new criticism of and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/04/03/the-keystone-xl-pipeline-and-its-politics-explained/">debate</a> about the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/03/us/pipeline-spills-stir-new-criticism-of-keystone-proposal.html">proposed</a> Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry crude oil from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico. The fuel passing through Keystone is the same type that leaked from ExxonMobil’s Pegasus pipeline in Arkansas, a fact that prompted some environmental groups to <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/1/greens-vow-mass-protests-obama-oks-keystone-xl/">promise protests</a> should President Barack Obama approve the project. Keystone has also been criticized by scientist James Hansen, who <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/james-hansen-retires-from-nasa-1.12725">retired</a> from NASA this week to pursue campaigning to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Even so, a <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2013/04/02/keystone-xl-pipeline-draws-broad-support/">new poll</a> shows broad bipartisan support for the pipeline, with 66 percent favoring its approval and construction. Obama told House Republicans last month that a decision on Keystone XL would <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/287967-obama-tells-gop-that-keystone-pipeline-decision-coming-soon">come soon</a>.</p>
<p><b>U.S. Coal Use Rising</b></p>
<p>According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), <a href="http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/index.cfm">natural gas prices</a> have risen significantly, increasing coal-fired electric generation. In fact, the <a href="http://theenergycollective.com/josephromm/204026/new-eia-data-reveal-us-coal-use-rising-again">EIA finds</a> natural gas prices have risen <a href="http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/er/index.cfm">50 percent</a> since April 2012. If prices continue to climb, the agency predicts coal use will increase 18 percent by 2040.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://climatepost.org/">The Climate Post</a> </em><em>offers a rundown of the week in climate and energy news. It is produced each Thursday</em><em> </em><em>by</em><em> </em><em><a href="http://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/">Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions.</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/04/04/epa-proposes-clean-air-measures-for-gasoline-finalizes-mats-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Studies Link Warming to Increased Weather Extremes</title>
		<link>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/28/studies-link-warming-to-increased-weather-extremes/</link>
		<comments>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/28/studies-link-warming-to-increased-weather-extremes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Profeta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NatGeo News Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hurricane katrina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildlife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/?p=87361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) finds global temperatures to be one of the best predictors of hurricane activity. In fact, the PNAS study found that a one degree Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) rise in global temperatures could multiply the frequency of Katrina-like storms by two to seven times. In the Arctic, melting sea ice—which reached its sixth lowest&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/03/14/1209980110">new study</a> in the journal <i>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences </i>(PNAS) finds global temperatures to be one of the best predictors of hurricane activity. In fact, the PNAS study found that a <a href="http://www.theatlanticcities.com/technology/2013/03/even-more-evidence-climate-change-will-hit-east-coast-cities-particularly-hard/5018/">one degree Celsius</a> (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) rise in <a href="http://www.wgbhnews.org/post/temperature-rising-will-climate-change-bring-more-extreme-weather">global</a> temperatures <a href="http://minnesota.publicradio.org/collections/special/columns/updraft/archive/2013/03/climate_cast_warmer_oceans_may.shtml">could multiply</a> the frequency of Katrina-like storms by two to seven times.</p>
<p>In the Arctic, melting <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2013/03/20/weather-extremes-global-warming-climate-change-louis-uccellini/2003513/">sea ice</a>—which reached its <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2013/03/26/arctic-sea-ice-reaches-maximum-6th-lowest-on-record/">sixth lowest level</a> on record—is driving its <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/03/130326-arctic-sea-ice-global-warming-science-environment-spring/">own extreme weather patterns</a>. “For the past few winters, large parts of Asia, North America, and Europe experienced these cold conditions above normal snowfall,” said Jiping Liu of the University of Albany who led a study in <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/02/120227-arctic-sea-ice-global-warming-winter-weather-science-environment/">PNAS on the topic</a>. “When we started to explore the reason why, our study suggested it was the decline of Arctic sea ice.” Liu was among <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-arctic-ice-extreme-weather-20130326,0,7534098.story">several researchers</a> to discuss the topic at a news conference, where it was noted that warming conditions in the Arctic may be weakening jet stream currents, causing extreme weather systems to hover in northern mid-latitudes.</p>
<p><b>States Are Taking an Active Role in Clean Energy Deployment  </b></p>
<p>In Congress, signs <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/daily/five-easy-pieces-of-energy-legislation-20130325?page=1">of progress</a> on a few small-scale energy bills are evident, but action at the state level is more robust. Washington D.C. and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/03/25/the-biggest-fights-over-renewable-energy-are-now-happening-in-the-states/">29 states</a> have renewable energy standards that require electric utilities to get a portion of their power from clean energy sources such as solar or wind. More than <a href="http://www.energytrendsinsider.com/2013/03/28/linking-states-to-federal-energy-research-talking-energy-innovation-with-arpa-es-cheryl-martin/">20 states have</a> created clean energy trust funds, and more than 40 offer some form of <a href="http://www.dsireusa.org/documents/summarymaps/Loan_Map.pdf">clean energy loans</a>. These measures are responsible for helping <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-31/u-s-renewable-energy-capacity-doubled-from-2009-2012-bnef-says.html">double renewable energy</a> capacity in the United States.</p>
<p>These successes aren’t without challenges. Renewable standards in <a href="http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/numbers-from-the-war-on-state-renewables-standards">22 states</a> could be lowered or repealed as part of a multi-pronged campaign to <a href="http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20130319/renewable-energy-standards-target-multi-pronged-attack">reverse</a> Renewable Portfolio Standard mandates. Some of the most heated debates are in Kansas, Vermont, Missouri, Pennsylvania and Ohio—where <a href="http://www.cleanenergyauthority.com/solar-energy-news/ohio-legislators-threaten-renewable-standard-032713">there’s a bill</a> recommending repeal of the state’s 2008 standard requiring utility companies to get 12.5 percent of their energy from renewable sources by 2025.</p>
<p><b>Plan Designed to Help Wildlife Adapt to Climate Change</b></p>
<p>A new plan—dubbed the National Fish, Wildlife and Plants Climate Adaptation Strategy—establishes key priorities to help wildlife <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-adaptation-strategy-20130327,0,4088605.story">adapt to climate change</a>. The <a href="http://www.wildlifeadaptationstrategy.gov/pdf/NFWPCAS-Final.pdf">nationwide plan</a> describes the expected future impacts to wildlife habitats, noting that “Even if further GHG emissions were halted today, alterations already underway in the Earth’s climate will last for hundreds or thousands of years. If GHG emissions continue, as is currently more likely, the planet’s average temperature is projected to rise 2.0 to 11.5 degrees Fahrenheit by the end of the century, with accompanying major changes in extreme weather events, variable and/or inconsistent weather patterns, sea level rise, and changing ocean conditions including increased acidification.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wildlifeadaptationstrategy.gov/pdf/Strategy-Highlights-Brochure.pdf">Seven goals</a> for resource managers are highlighted in the plan, which was <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/03/26/climate-change-requires-us-land-conservation/2021931/">developed in response</a> to a request from Congress. The goals include conserving and connecting habitat, managing species and habitats to allow sustainable use and protect ecosystems, reducing non-climate stressors such as pollution and invasive species, conducting research to increase knowledge and educating the public about climate change and its effects on resources.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://climatepost.org/">The Climate Post</a> </em><em>offers a rundown of the week in climate and energy news. It is produced each Thursday</em><em> </em><em>by</em><em> </em><em><a href="http://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/">Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions.</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/28/studies-link-warming-to-increased-weather-extremes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Details of Obama’s Plan to Reduce Dependence on Foreign Oil Emerge</title>
		<link>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/21/details-of-obamas-plan-to-reduce-dependence-on-foreign-oil-emerge/</link>
		<comments>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/21/details-of-obamas-plan-to-reduce-dependence-on-foreign-oil-emerge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Profeta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NatGeo News Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/?p=86477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White House has released more details about the Energy Security Trust that President Barack Obama first mentioned in February’s State of the Union address. Obama introduced the plan—which aims to reduce the country’s dependence on foreign oil, improve vehicle fuel efficiency and protect consumers from gas price spikes—during a speech at Chicago’s Argonne National Laboratory. “By investing in our&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The White House has released <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/03/15/what-you-need-know-about-energy-security-trust">more details</a> about the Energy Security Trust that President Barack Obama <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/282713-obama-floats-energy-security-trust-in-state-of-the-union-address">first mentioned</a> in February’s State of the Union address. Obama introduced the plan—which aims to reduce the country’s dependence on foreign oil, improve vehicle fuel efficiency and protect consumers from gas price spikes—<a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-03-15/news/chi-obama-energy-security-trust-20130315_1_new-research-and-technology-energy-strategy-energy-security-trust">during a speech</a> at Chicago’s Argonne National Laboratory. “By investing in our energy security,” <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/03/15/obama-energy-security-trust/1989005/">he noted</a>, “we are helping our businesses succeed and we’re creating good middle class jobs right here in America. The only way to really break this cycle of spiking oil prices—the only way to break that cycle for good—is to shift our cars entirely off oil.”</p>
<p>The Energy Security Trust <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/infographic/energy-security-trust">focuses on</a> shifting America’s cars and trucks off oil entirely by investing in research for advances in electricity, domestically produced natural gas and homegrown biofuels as cost-effective alternatives to fossil fuel. Over the course of 10 years, the trust will provide <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/offshore-drilling-energy-plan-faces-roadblock-89098.html">$2 billion</a> in research dollars from federal oil and gas development revenue.</p>
<p>The plan, the White House said, <a href="http://www.energytribune.com/75124/an-energy-security-trust">builds on</a> an earlier <a href="http://www.secureenergy.org/policy/national-strategy-energy-security-2013">report</a> and on strategies that resulted in reductions in carbon dioxide of 13 percent since 2007, highlighted in a <a href="http://www.epa.gov/fueleconomy/fetrends/1975-2012/420s13001.pdf">new study</a> by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It is intended to <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/130555194/Obama-Energy-Fact-Sheet">solidify America’s position</a> as a world leader in advanced transportation technology. Feelings regarding the measure, however, are mixed. <a href="http://theenergycollective.com/jessejenkins/200436/how-serious-are-president-obama-and-congressional-republicans-about-energy-secur">Some are praising</a> the investment in research and development funding in light of sequester cuts, while others see little success for the proposal <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/15/us-obama-energy-idUSBRE92E0BM20130315?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=politicsNews&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reuters+Politics+News%29">without a dramatic increase</a> in oil and gas leasing on federal. Energy production on the nation’s federal lands would be among the top responsibilities for Sally Jewell, whose <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/289533-senate-panel-approves-obamas-interior-nominee">nomination</a> to the post of Interior Secretary <a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/56040852-90/jewell-interior-committee-nomination.html.csp">was advanced</a> by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee today.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, a <a href="http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/03/nas-by-2050-its-possible-to-cut-car-petroleum-use-by-80-percent/">new report</a> states that by 2050 it is possible to cut car petroleum use by 80 percent—a much easier feat than cutting carbon dioxide emissions by a similar amount.</p>
<p><b>EPA Could Delay Climate Rules for Power Plants</b></p>
<p>A year ago, the EPA unveiled the <a href="http://epa.gov/carbonpollutionstandard/actions.html">proposed</a> New Source Performance Standards, which would require all new coal- and gas-fired power plants built in the U.S. to emit no more than 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt hour of electricity produced. According to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/epa-may-delay-climate-rules-for-new-power-plants/2013/03/15/28e9d37e-8cda-11e2-b63f-f53fb9f2fcb4_story.html?hpid=z1"><i>The Washington Post</i></a><i>, </i>the Obama administration is <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/major-changes-for-greenhouse-gas-standards-88962.html">likely to miss its April 13</a> deadline for finalizing the rules and may be considering revising them. Some industry critics have <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/regwatch/energyenvironment/288815-coal-state-dems-push-epa-to-tone-down-emissions-rule">expressed concern</a> with the EPA’s proposed rule. Four moderate Senate Democrats also urged the President <a href="http://manchin.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/files/serve?File_id=d9c5550b-9479-4703-95f2-88062895b39f&amp;SK=1EEFA1AB8F3AF182379038611A596A26">in a letter</a> to scale back provisions for coal-fired plants. Revamping the new-source rules to lay out a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/15/usa-climate-power-idUSL1N0C77PK20130315">separate standard</a> for <a href="http://www.worldcoal.org/coal-the-environment/coal-use-the-environment/improving-efficiencies/">coal-fired power plants</a> could <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/03/18/why-the-epa-might-delay-its-carbon-rules-for-power-plants/">take another six months</a>, according to legal experts, but it might give the EPA a better chance of defending the rule in court.</p>
<p><b>Biofuels Suffer from High Prices</b></p>
<p>The punishment Midwest corn yields took from the drought has pushed corn prices so high that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/us/17ethanol.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=3&amp;">nearly 10 percent</a> of the nation’s ethanol plants stopped production this past year. The credits refiners use to meet the EPA’s renewable fuel mandate that results in ethanol being blended into gasoline are <a href="http://fuelfix.com/blog/2013/03/18/ethanol-credits-are-squeezing-refiners/">spiking, too</a>. The 10-fold increase in the price of the credits is causing some to <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/03/21/usa-ethanol-lawmakers-idUKL1N0CC2VK20130321">be concerned</a> about an increase in <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/rising-cost-of-corn-ethanol-credits-alarms-hill-89043.html">gasoline prices</a>. In fact, this year U.S. drivers could face an increase in these prices of nearly <a href="http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20130320/BUSINESS06/303200025/Ethanol-credit-casino-could-cost-U-S-drivers-13-billion-gas-pump">$13 billion</a>.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://climatepost.org/">The Climate Post</a> </em><em>offers a rundown of the week in climate and energy news. It is produced each Thursday</em><em> </em><em>by</em><em> </em><em><a href="http://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/">Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions.</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/21/details-of-obamas-plan-to-reduce-dependence-on-foreign-oil-emerge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon Tax Is a Popular Topic in Washington</title>
		<link>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/14/carbon-tax-is-a-popular-topic-in-washington/</link>
		<comments>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/14/carbon-tax-is-a-popular-topic-in-washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Profeta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NatGeo News Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fukushima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/?p=85441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since China announced it will hold off plans to introduce a carbon tax, the idea has generated some activity on Capitol Hill. Lawmakers on Tuesday proposed a draft bill that would charge the largest industrial polluters a fee for, or carbon tax on, their fossil-fuel emissions. The plan, proposed by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Rep. Earl&#8230;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since China announced it will <a href="http://www.eco-business.com/news/china-backing-away-from-carbon-tax-in-2013-official-says/">hold off</a> plans to introduce a carbon tax, the idea has generated some activity on Capitol Hill.</p>
<p>Lawmakers on Tuesday proposed a <a href="http://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/news/release/waxman-whitehouse-blumenauer-and-schatz-release-carbon-price-discussion-draft-">draft bill</a> that would charge the largest industrial polluters a fee for, or carbon tax on, their fossil-fuel emissions. The <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/287641-democrats-circulate-carbon-fee-bill">plan</a>, proposed by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), and Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), includes <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/12/representatives-release-carbon-emissions-tax-plan/">three possible</a> per-ton prices for <a href="http://www.powermag.com/environmental/Democrats-Seek-Feedback-on-Newly-Proposed-Carbon-Fee-for-Emission-Sources_5444.html">carbon pollution</a>—$15, $25 or $30—and annual cost increases ranging from 2 percent to 8 percent to ensure that emissions continue to decrease. The new bill solicits feedback on how <a href="http://eenews.net/eenewspm/2013/03/12/archive/3?terms=Waxman+and+Whitehouse+float+carbon+tax+proposal">revenue</a> (<i>subscription required</i>) generated by the fee or tax should be spent but proposes that proceeds go toward mitigating energy costs for consumers, reducing the deficit, protecting jobs, decreasing the tax liability for businesses and individuals and investing in other activities that could reduce carbon pollution.</p>
<p>The Waxman-Whitehouse draft, which has not been <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2013/03/dem-lawmakers-draft-new-carbon-tax-bill">formally introduced</a> into Congress or <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/03/13/lawmakers-unveil-a-choose-your-own-adventure-carbon-tax/">even finalized</a>, is one of a <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/283189-sen-boxer-plans-to-get-climate-bill-to-floor-by-summer">few carbon tax</a> proposals circulating in Washington. A measure by Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT) was <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/14/us-usa-climate-legislation-idUSBRE91D1BX20130214">released last month</a>. The same week as the release of the Waxman-Whitehouse draft, <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/mar/13/issue-of-carbon-tax-rears-up-once-again/">Republicans</a> introduced a resolution that opposed a national carbon tax, citing its threat to the <a href="http://theadvocate.com/home/5429959-125/scalise-and-fleming-oppose-carbon">economy and businesses</a>.</p>
<p>Two studies of a carbon tax have produced very different results. A <a href="http://www.nam.org/~/media/ECF11DF347094E0DA8AF7BD9A696ABDB.ashx">study</a> by the National Association of Manufacturers <a href="http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/02/vitter_mr_president_will_you_o.html">finds</a> that a carbon tax starting <a href="http://triblive.com/opinion/editorials/3608806-74/percent-carbon-tax#axzz2NRQhNjLi">at $20</a> per ton and rising 4 percent yearly would <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2013/03/13/5260050/carbon-tax-means-all-pain-no-gain.html">result</a> in an economic slowdown. Meanwhile, a <a href="http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2013/03/12-carbon-tax-gale">report</a> by the Brookings Institution finds that a carbon tax could have <a href="http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2013/03/12-taxing-carbon-gale">benefits</a>—including improving environmental outcomes and increasing economic efficiency.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/climate/policydesign/americans-think-the-climate-is-changing#.UUC5Mdb_l8E">national poll</a> released recently by Duke University found that <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/13/climate-change-believers-belief-us-america_n_2677935.html">29 percent</a> of the respondents strongly or somewhat supported a carbon tax. There was much more support surrounding a clean energy standard or other traditional measures to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
<p><b>Will “Fire Ice” Discovery Revolutionize the Energy Industry?</b></p>
<p>Japan has <a href="http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/03/methane-hydrate-flow-established-off-japan.html">produced</a> methane from methane hydrates, a fossil fuel that behaves like ice, from <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/mar/12/japan-extract-frozen-gas-seabed">deep under</a> the ocean for the <a href="http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/japan-extracts-fire-ice-gas-from-seabed-341642">first time</a>. Deposits of the fuel source, known as “fire ice,” may be large enough to supply the country’s natural gas needs for <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-12/japan-begins-test-production-of-frozen-gas-locked-under-seabed.html">years</a>. An estimated <a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-03/13/japan-methane-hydrate">1.1 trillion cubic meters</a> of gas are trapped off Shikoku Island. Japan hopes to convert the trapped methane into natural gas that could help address recent energy woes, but the Japanese government says it is still at least <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/03/12/japan-tries-to-unlock-the-worlds-biggest-source-of-carbon-based-fuel/">five years</a> away from commercial extraction. Japanese officials point to the <a href="http://theweek.com/article/index/241238/how-japans-flammable-ice-breakthrough-could-revolutionize-the-energy-industry">recent gas boom</a> in the United States as evidence that complex drilling processes can yield big results—a fact that has Australia worried. <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/threat-to-lng-exports-as-japan-unlocks-gas/story-e6frg9df-1226596754089">Japan is Australia’s</a> top natural gas customer.</p>
<p>The fuel source is also being explored in Canada and the United States, with the latter funding <a href="http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/press/2012/120831_energy_department.html">14 research projects</a> on methane hydrates. The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that naturally occurring gas hydrates could contain more than 100,000 trillion cubic feet of natural gas—<a href="http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=8690">potentially more</a> organic carbon than the world’s coal, oil and other forms of natural gas combined. Recent mappings off the North Carolina and South Carolina coasts show <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/13/business/global/japan-says-it-is-first-to-tap-methane-hydrate-deposit.html?pagewanted=1">large offshore accumulations</a> of methane hydrate, but the potential environmental effects of drilling for hydrates remain little understood.</p>
<p><b>The Future of Nuclear Power</b></p>
<p>Monday marked the <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/in-pictures-two-years-after-the-tsunami-and-earthquake-fukushima-remains-in-ruins-8530712.html">second anniversary</a> of Japan’s tsunami and the Fukushima <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-03-11/two-years-on-fukushima-casts-no-shadow-over-nuclear">nuclear disaster</a>. Before the meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, Japan was the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/14/japan-end-nuclear-power">third largest</a> consumer of nuclear energy, behind the United States. Now just <a href="http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/press/2012/120831_energy_department.html">two of the country’s 50</a> operable reactors are online. With plans to phase out nuclear power by <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/15/world/asia/japan-will-try-to-halt-nuclear-power-by-the-end-of-the-2030s.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0">2040</a>, the long-term energy strategy is expected to bring <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323826704578355642606368924.html">higher electricity rates</a> for consumers this year.</p>
<p>The future of nuclear remains <a href="http://www.powermag.com/nuclear/The-Second-Anniversary-of-Fukushima-Daiichi-Japan-and-the-Worlds-Nuclear-Sector_5443_p2.html">less certain</a> worldwide. The head of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) recently told more than 3,000 industry executives, experts and government regulators that when it comes to commercial reactors they must be ready to deal <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/13/science/earth/head-of-us-nuclear-watchdog-emphasizes-unknown.html">with the unknown</a>.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/nuclear_power_risk/safety/nrc-and-nuclear-power-safety-annual.html">new report</a> by the Union of Concerned Scientists is more critical of the industry. It points to safety mishaps at <a href="http://www.theatlanticcities.com/politics/2013/03/map-nuclear-meltdown-near-misses/4944/">nuclear plants</a> across the United States in 2012. The study, released shortly after the NRC annual <a href="http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2013/13-013.pdf">report card</a>, details a <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Energy-Voices/2013/0311/Fukushima-two-years-later-How-safe-are-US-nuclear-plants">dozen</a> events.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://climatepost.org/">The Climate Post</a> </em><em>offers a rundown of the week in climate and energy news. It is produced each Thursday</em><em> </em><em>by</em><em> </em><em><a href="http://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/">Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions.</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/14/carbon-tax-is-a-popular-topic-in-washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>