National Geographic
Menu

The Ivory Trade: Thinking Like a Businessman to Stop the Business

Most experts believe China is the world’s leading consumer of ivory products, and, according to a recent survey conducted to support our upcoming National Geographic Special, Battle for the Elephants, China’s demand for ivory products is at an all-time high.

What’s the impact of that high demand? As we put together the treatment for the film, which airs in the U.S. Wednesday, February 27th on PBS, we were stunned to find that no one had ever performed a comprehensive market analysis of the ivory trade in China. Why was ivory so popular there? Who was buying it, how much were they buying, and for what reasons?

Along with the director of our film, John Heminway, and our producers, Katie Carpenter, and JJ Kelley, we began thinking about ivory as a commodity, like any other luxury product. We weren’t being callous, just practical. If we could figure out the contours of the demand for ivory, maybe we could use that knowledge to help reduce the demand.

So in a bid to stop the killing, we started thinking like entrepreneurs intent on making a killing in the ivory trade. Who would our customers be? Why would they buy our product? What types of ivory products would appeal to buyers? What impediments to market would there be for our product? What help or hindrance might we expect from the government?

With these basic questions in hand, we sought out a market analysis firm based in China to do the work. We hired Ifop Asia, a company with offices in Shanghai and Hong Kong that has a long track record of market surveys focused on luxury goods.

Assessing the Market

Over several weeks, Ifop, in consultation with our team, devised a survey. To increase the likelihood of accurate responses, respondents answered a variety of questions about luxury goods, including gold and jade. They weren’t told that the objective was to analyze the market in ivory goods.

The survey polled consumers in nine of China’s largest cities. The sample group of 600 targeted members of the Chinese middle and upper middle class, as defined by those with an annual income of RMB 200,000 (U.S. $32,000) and above. The average respondent’s mean income was RMB 520,917 (U.S. $84,000). Ages ranged from 18-55, with a mean age of 35. Gender break down was 49 percent male, and 51 percent female.

The findings helped round out the research in our film and provided a lot more data about the trade that we couldn’t include. Reading the key findings is a sobering experience.

According to the survey, 84 percent of Chinese middle and upper-middle class consumers surveyed plan to buy ivory goods in the future. That represents a very large number and a very grim future for elephants.

The study found that video and billboard advertisements in China that show how poaching is threatening Africa’s elephant population largely fail to deter consumers.

(More than 50 percent of respondents have seen this type of messaging in videos or billboards.)

What Might Deter More Buying?

Nearly 60 percent of respondents believe that making ivory “illegal to purchase under any circumstances” or “the strong recommendation of a government leader” would be the most effective way to stop ivory trading.

Extensive research and reporting by investigative journalist Bryan Christy, who is featured in our film and who wrote the National Geographic October cover story, Blood Ivory: Ivory Worship, revealed that Chinese desire for ivory is at least partly rooted in the country’s cultural and spiritual heritage.

That seems to be supported by other findings. For example, ivory ownership is high: Eight out of ten households surveyed owned at least one ivory product, with 2.7 pieces on average per household. While some ivory products were received as a gift, the incidence of purchasing ivory is high as well: 68 percent of respondents have purchased at least one ivory product in the past.

The survey was revealing about the appeal of ivory. Around one-half describe an ivory product as a “rarity,” 35 percent call it a “luxury,” and 29 percent think it confers “status.” Fourteen percent associate ivory with “wisdom,” while 87 percent associate purchasing ivory products with a feeling of  “prestige.”

Currently in China, some ivory can be legally traded, apparently adding to confusion in the market as to what is or is not legal. So, for example, less than one-fifth of respondents associate owning such an item with animal cruelty, and only one-tenth feel uncomfortable about its possession.

That could be because some ivory for sale comes from the long extinct mammoth, while other ivory is from stockpiles sold legally to China in a 2008 auction that was allowed by CITES, the international trade convention charged with managing the 1989 international trade ban.

Still, a study by the International Fund for Animal Welfare found that an estimated four-fifths of ivory items sold in China are believed to have been made of smuggled tusks.

A Glimmer of Hope

For the optimists among us, the survey has a small bright spot: 16 percent of respondents say they will not buy ivory.

Our hope is that by providing these data to the wider world, we might grow that 16 percent. Collaborating with the Chinese—people and government—to stem the tide is the only way forward.

And lest we think our hands in the West are clean, the U.S. and Western Europe are still important ivory demand countries. As our film makes clear, in the late 19th and early 20th century, U.S. demand for ivory, mostly for piano keyboards, brushes, combs, and pool balls dropped African elephant populations by the millions.

The difference in 2013 is that today there simply aren’t that many African elephants left.

The China survey is based on respondents’ answers, but if it’s fair to extrapolate, and if 84 percent of the Chinese middle and upper-middle classes plan to buy even the smallest of trinkets, that’s more than two million items.

Unless demand is dramatically reduced, that may spell the end of the wild elephant.

Comments

  1. Edit
    United Kingdom
    April 2, 10:12 am

    Where could I get this ifop study from? Many thanks!

  2. Elizabeth Reinhart
    United States
    September 7, 2013, 1:34 pm

    I agree with comment stated above that in order to divest the trade it needs to begin with the carvers in China.

    Here is the contact for the vice president and secretary Council of China Arts and Crafts Association:
    zmx_chenjing@126.com

    Wang Shan, is the secretary general of the China Arts and Crafts Association, and the person in charge of the affiliated China Ivory Carving Association.

    http://www.worldcraftscouncil.org/boardmembers.html

  3. Ann Lewis
    England, Caribbean, Africa
    August 22, 2013, 7:14 pm

    Yes, it is “bye bye elephants” in about 7 to 10 years, at the present rate of poaching.
    At this late stage, the only hope is for pressure to be put on Far Eastern Governments to ban the sale of ivory altogether and to shut down the carvers of trinkets. A criminal Black Market thrives worldwide, so similar pressure must be brought to bear RIGHT NOW on the African countries who are involved in the Ivory Trade (many of whom depend on safari tourism for revenue.) The point has been reached where this can only be done at Governmental level, so LOBBY YOUR MP’s and let’s get this moving! NO TIME TO LOSE!

  4. Richard
    March 30, 2013, 9:34 am

    There is good information here to bring to our govt. representatives (Congressmen in the US). Public policy is the most powerful antidote, but will only work with constant pressure on our governments to push for international agreements.
    International pressure will eventually work. It has already begun. So don’t just sit there. Minimally, write to your representatives!
    -Richard

  5. Daniel Jost
    March 22, 2013, 7:25 pm

    “According to the survey, 84 percent of Chinese middle and upper-middle class consumers surveyed plan to buy ivory goods in the future…”

    Then the solution is actually quite straightforward: 84 percent of Chinese middle and upper-middle class consumers should have a bullet put through their head and their face chopped off…

  6. Idiolect
    Los Angeles
    March 18, 2013, 1:43 pm

    Why don’t people in Chins understand that when the elephants are gone there will be NO MORE IVORY? Why don’t the Chinese raise elephants?

  7. dan bendor
    connecticut
    March 4, 2013, 9:03 pm

    Harvest Ivory–spare elephants.

    greatest danger for elephants is man’s killing them. they can survive without their tusks. governments could harvest the ivory & that would remove the killing incentive.

  8. Nicole
    USA
    February 28, 2013, 9:56 am

    These animals are so incredibly special that the killing of them will reflect badly on us as humans around the world. We must strive to reach the persons who buy the ivory and impart to them that the holding of items derived from killing an animal like the elephant will only bring bad luck and evil into the owners life. Everyone needs to make some type of effort to conserve these treasures no matter how small. People in power need to stand up and begin to change public opinion. Wake up China!!! To be a world power you must not carry the baggage of murder around your necks.

  9. Save Queenie Save Elephants Facebook
    Facebook
    February 27, 2013, 11:25 pm

    It is the China Ivory Carvers Asso. that must be closed down as it says it has “the right to carve.” The carvers are the smallest and easiest chain in the link to stop IF the Chinese gov’t had the will to shut down the workshops. They stopped foot binding overnight, they can do the same with the carvers (as well as raid these retailer). No carving = nothing to sell = nothing to buy = no demand = no poaching.

  10. Dave
    Canada
    February 27, 2013, 10:27 pm

    It’s sick what the Chinese government is doing. And not ALL that ivory in their stores is 20 years old. It’s impossible! Those factories and stores should all be shut down and everything turn to ashes!!! Elephants are so beautiful, but Japan and china don’t see them in that perspective at all. It’s very sad!!

  11. Ima Ryma
    February 27, 2013, 1:12 am

    Trinkets have always been a “need”
    Of humans for the vanity.
    Mostly minerals do the deed,
    But also there’s blood ivory,
    The slaughter of elephants for
    That tusk that can be turned to fill
    The need for humans more and more,
    To be measured by what we kill.
    That humans will somehow evolve,
    Some optimists say there is hope
    This is a problem we will solve.
    But mostly pessimists say, “Nope!”

    Humans will have their trinkets, so
    Bye bye elephants – doncha know!