The Colorado River may have cut the Grand Canyon, but for much of its course the river is no longer so mighty. Most of the time, the Colorado no longer even reaches the sea.

The moisture the Colorado River brings to an arid part of the United States and a piece of northern Mexico has sustained generations of people and many generations of wildlife. But that water has long been over allocated, sucked dry by the 30 million people who rely on it for drinking and irrigation.

Once free, the Colorado now has many dams along its 1,450 miles (2,333 kilometers). Its life-giving water is divided up among seven U.S. states and Mexico according to a series of treaties and agreements. But precious little flows remain to support the rich ecosystems that once flourished along the river’s path.

As Wade Davis recently reported, the Colorado once supported a vast, sprawling delta where it met the Gulf of California:

As recently as the last years of the nineteenth century the wetlands produced enough wood to fuel the steamships and paddle wheelers that supplied all of the army outposts, mining camps, and ragtag settlements of the lower Colorado. Today the gallery forests of cottonwood and willow are a shadow of memory, displaced by thickets of tamarisk and arrowweed, invasive species capable of surviving in soils poisoned by salt.

Davis added that, as a result of the loss of rich sediments that were formerly deposited into the Gulf, “Marine productivity has fallen by as much as 95 percent, and all that remains to recall the bounty of the estuary are the countless millions of shells that form the islands and beaches on the shore.”

Davis and Sandra Postel, National Geographic’s Freshwater Fellow, have also documented the toll the drying of the delta has taken on the region’s indigenous people, the Cucapá (also spelled Cocopah), the “People of the River.”

Postel wrote:

Historical accounts suggest that four hundred years ago as many as 5,000 Cucapá were living in the delta. Today, perhaps 300 remain.  Theirs is a culture at risk of extinction – and the primary reason is the colossal 20th-century grab of the waters of the Colorado River.

We Are All to Blame

It’s easy to blame farmers and ranchers along the Colorado who draw from its channel to water their crops or quench the thirst of their cows. Or glittering cities like Las Vegas and Los Angeles, which pipe in water from long distances to fill pools and water lawns.

These and others are the immediate consumers of water from the Colorado, but the truth is that we are all at least partially responsible. Many of us consume products that come from the region, whether in the form of cornmeal, hamburgers, or electronics. Many of us visit the region to ski, play golf, hike, or shop.

We live in an increasingly connected world, in which we ship “virtual water” in the form of products and even services around the world. We can’t simply fix the Colorado by piping water from another place, as Brian Richter recently pointed out. We need more holistic solutions. And fact is, many of us use more water than we need, perhaps more than could be called our “fair share.”

In the U.S., we use twice as much water per person as the global average.

dry Colorado River Delta in Change the Course video

We Can All “Change the Course”

We all can do better. Take our water calculator to see how much water you use everyday, hidden in your diet and wardrobe, and to make your transportation possible.

Or, get right down to business, and pledge to start saving a little water in your own life. Make a small change today, and you may find yourself quickly forming a more water-efficient habit. Eat one less serving of meat (it takes 634 gallons of water to make one burger), skip one cup of coffee (37 gallons), or carpool (it takes 13 gallons of water to make one gallon of gas).

And yes, please do turn off the faucet when you brush your teeth. Every drop counts.

Under the leadership of Sandra Postel, National Geographic’s freshwater team has joined forces with the Bonneville Environment Foundation and Participant Media (the creative folks behind An Inconvenient Truth, Waiting for Superman, and Last Call at the Oasis), to bring ordinary people together to magnify collective efforts, in a program called Change the Course (view the official press release). On the campaign website, people can enter their email address or phone number to receive regular updates on restoration work in the Colorado River Basin.

How It Works

For each person who signs up to Change the Course (and hopefully pledges to start saving water in their own life), corporate partners will donate funds to support restorative work along the Colorado. The team will work with local conservation groups on the ground, on projects designed to achieve high ecological value.

Change the Course’s Charter Sponsor is Silk. Some of the projects under consideration include helping farmers in the basin increase their irrigation efficiency, and replacing invasive, water-sucking plants with native species.

Already, Change the Course helped fund restoration of water to the parched Yampa River in Colorado, near Steamboat Springs. In an innovative partnership, such water users as farmers, ranchers, and water districts temporarily leased water rights to the Colorado Water Trust.

Going forward, Change the Course will restore 1,000 gallons of water to the Colorado Basin for each pledge made. The more people who sign up, the easier it will be to attract more sponsors—companies who likely want to “balance” their own water budgets by helping return flows to nature. It can be a way to offset consumption in various stages of their businesses.

The Change the Course team is piloting this innovative restoration approach in the Colorado River Basin, with hopes of moving it out to other river basins around the nation or the globe.

As the slogan goes, it’s never too late to Change the Course.

Please sign up today to help Change the Course

 

Special thanks to Silk, the Charter Sponsor for Change the Course. Additional funding generously provided by the Walton Family Foundation.

Comments

  1. antoinette schwechlen
    Rixheim France
    May 19, 4:58 pm

    Hi has just watch the program from the french television channel about how dramatic the Colorado River has lost its water level every year, I hope that all these States , or these 30 million americans who depend from the river source would now be aware of the impact . It’s not too late yet , please change your attitude and use your water supply intellegently.

  2. Mary Reese
    Pensacola Florida
    May 16, 7:49 pm

    I lived in Big River, CA and Parker,Az for many years and enjoyed life on the Colorado River immensely. To float down its beautiful stretches or fish its gorgeous banks was heavenly. I do so wish that for others for generations to come.

  3. Sarah
    USA
    May 14, 5:21 am

    when did this start ? This problem?

  4. Phoenix
    Washington
    May 12, 1:07 am

    Perhaps it’s time for America to invest heavily on desalination and waste water recycling technologies, similar to what Israel is doing to meet their needs.

  5. colorado
    colorado
    May 8, 11:50 am

    here in north colorado we’ve been getting pounded with rain lately and in fort collins all our riveres are still dry do to damming upstream.

  6. ken n
    calgary
    April 25, 12:02 pm

    how much fresh water in Az & NM goes to golf courses?

  7. Sabya Sachi Sarker
    Bangladesh
    April 5, 10:14 am

    Humanism not only for human but also for another living being. We know human can change the world, also can save the world. We can’t stop natural calamities but we can save the world if we don’t misuse or waste the natural products. Water is the most important & essential part of our life. So Plz don’t misuse it.

  8. docbrody
    Pensylvania
    April 3, 8:15 pm

    I understand conserving water in Colorado, Nevada, California, etc, but what good does it do for someone like me to conserve water where I live? I’m not against doing it, but I just wonder what good it will really do. We get over 42 inches of rain here per year. That’s more than Seattle, the supposed rainfall capital of the US. We are literally overflowing with water. And its not as if after I drink a glass or water my lawn that the water disappears forever. Its ultimately recycled back into the environment. So why should I conserve water?

    • Brian Clark Howard
      April 5, 11:38 am

      Hi. Thanks for the comment. You bring up a good point about water used locally in your own watershed, but it’s also important to remember that everyone’s complete water footprint actually lands all over the U.S. and the world, often affecting water-stressed regions. If you wear cotton it was most likely not grown locally, and chances are good not all your food was sourced in your watershed either (or your electricity). If you eat lettuce in the winter, most likely you are “eating” Colorado River water.

      Household use of water is only about 5% of our total water footprint when we look at society as a whole, which suggests that we all have a lot of room for conservation.

  9. MyName
    anonymous
    April 2, 8:04 pm

    Let’s give water to politicians which can turn water into hot air and steam. We can use the hot air to melt the ice caps faster and use the steam to drive turbines.

  10. jim Moose
    March 30, 10:56 pm

    Chinese Bladder Ships? Give me a break! There isn’t any such thing and the rumor is spread by ignorant idiots.

  11. dave marquardt
    Alma Co.
    March 30, 8:53 pm

    we are here in the now, so please let everyone help as they can conserve this precious resource. Education for everyone will help, so don’t give up hope.There are much more gloomy things on the horizon for manmade armageddon to do us in! out Dave

  12. Bill Cody
    Syracuse, NY
    March 28, 1:43 pm

    We are all to blame? Not here, like Millions of others I’m getting a little tired of the non-stop gloomy clouds, snow and rain we’ve been getting up here since the fall. I’ve no interestest in H2O conservation such as low flush toilets. Those in the SW feel free to conserve.

  13. Lisa Borre
    March 18, 3:16 pm

    Diana,
    To learn more about the causes of declining water levels in the Great Lakes, you might be interested in this post: “Warming Lakes: Climate Change and Variability Drive Low Water Levels on the Great Lakes”
    (http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2012/11/20/climate-change-and-variability-drive-low-water-levels-on-the-great-lakes/).

    I’ve heard the concern you raise about water being collected in the Great Lakes and shipped to China, but the numbers just don’t add up. The numbers that do add up are the ones related to historic water diversions that were never offset and more recent trends related to climate warming. The Great Lakes have a great deal of natural variability, and now added to this, a warming climate is causing the water to evaporate at higher rates.

    One final note, I assume that you meant to say the lakes have dropped 30 inches, not 30 feet. This is closer to the current water levels for Lakes Michigan and Huron, the hardest hit of the five Great Lakes, which are about 29 inches below the long-term average since record-keeping began in 1918.

  14. Diana Worth
    Colorado
    March 15, 10:36 pm

    Not only are those from other States taking water from the Colorado River, look into why China is allowed to bring their bladder barges into the Great Lakes, filling the bladders with fresh water, then taking it back to China. The Great Lakes water level has already dropped 30 feet! That is a lot of drinking water that will destroy the natural aquifer, if it has not already happened!

  15. Nikoli Dracovitch
    Russia
    March 8, 11:42 am

    i concour with saving colorado river

  16. jules
    germany
    March 7, 11:23 am

    How do you print?

    • Brian Clark Howard
      March 11, 10:17 am

      Hi. Thanks for checking out the site. We don’t have a special print button, but you should be able to print through your browser.
      Best

  17. Dave Snavely
    Ornage, CA
    March 7, 2:25 am

    September 29, 200 (7)

    HenryPaulson Secretary of the Treasury
    Department of the Treasury
    1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
    Washington, D.C. 20220

    Dear Secretary Paulson:

    Many Americans are elated that President Bush wishes to take a leadership position in global warming. Listed below is a water and energy concept for your consideration.

    **CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEVADA & MEXICO…A multi-national geothermal project near Yuma, Arizona would be extremely rewarding! We could pipe in sea water from the Sea of Cortez and use abundant Southwestern geothermal energy to power our desalination plants. After sending pure water to San Diego and Riverside Counties, aquaculture and irrigated agriculture would develop in this sector. Southern Arizona Native Americans would receive their electricity requirements and America will share free fresh water with Mexico. Mexico had been receiving less water, yet with a higher salt content from the Colorado, hurting their agricultural, economic development and tourism projects.

    Less water demand in the south will allow Northern areas greater usage or storage. LA pipes water from the Colorado river across the desert to many metropolitan beach cities also.

  18. Grace
    U.S
    March 5, 6:31 pm

    I think the problem is the dams. They are taking the water away so there is no way to conserve the river if the dam is making electricity. Also, since there are many cracks in the area, the water seeps through them like water going down a drain. The water is still there, you just cant see it and there isn’t much water either.

  19. Anthony
    HARLEM SHAKE
    February 22, 10:55 am

    To global warming believers: It says gullible on the ceiling.

  20. Martin Aston
    Washington, DC, United States
    February 21, 10:17 am

    step 1: stop wasting water on grass lawns in the desert Southwest.

  21. Anthony
    Iowa
    February 20, 11:15 am

    -_-
    The water will still be there, just below the river. The water is just going to seep into the ground, it probably won’t go anywhere. It just won’t be seen where it used to be. New water cannot be created, and water cannot be destroyed.

  22. Press To Digitate
    United States
    February 16, 6:11 pm

    You could “conserve” every last drop presently extracted from the Colorado River, and it wouldnt make any difference. The diminishing mountain snow melt will ultimately run the river dry in the next one to four decades. This will render the Las Vegas, Phoenix, and Tucson metropolitan areas uninhabitable. Its not about how much water we use, its about Climate Change. ‘Conservation’, a failed mugwump concept from the 1970s, must give way to ‘Sustainability’; unfortunately, we probably havent learned this lesson soon enough.

  23. ken arnold
    Watson, Michigan
    February 16, 11:55 am

    I read a ‘white paper’ recently where the author tied to field the impact that global populations have on the carrying capacity of the earth.
    His conclusion : Humanity, homo sapiens Rex, has finally acheived plague status .
    Sadly, I must agree .

  24. ahmedhasan
    egypt
    February 15, 4:20 am

    serch soil

  25. Tim Upham
    United States
    February 14, 9:48 pm

    The problem with the Colorado River is that it no longer goes to the Gulf of California anymore, because of the dams and so much water being siphoned out of it. The Hoover Dam especially, when waters are released from the dam, they are cold and clear, and this has greatly affected three fishes: Colorado squawfish, bonytail chub, and razorback sucker. Which need warm, silt-laden waters to spawn in.