National Geographic
Menu

Visualizing Water

By Brian Richter with Jason Pearson of TRUTHstudio

Help Us Communicate the Water Story of our Planet!

In a poll taken last year, The Nature Conservancy found that 77% of Americans have absolutely no idea where their water comes from.

This lack of understanding about how water is delivered to our homes is symptomatic of broader water illiteracy – too few understand the basic workings of global or local water cycles, how much water we use in our homes, factories, or farm fields, how water shortages develop, or how our use of water might affect the health of natural ecosystems.

If we don’t understand these basic characteristics of water and its use, we likely won’t understand how we can use water more sustainably, or what we should expect of other water users or managers.

In the past few months I’ve been working with Jason Pearson of TRUTHstudio to develop some graphical illustrations of our water sources and uses.  We sincerely hope that these graphics will be helpful to educators, scientists, and anyone else interested in building awareness and understanding of water.

We’ll be sharing a variety of these graphics with you as part of forthcoming blogs here in Water Currents.  Today we are introducing eight illustrations (see below).  Each of the illustrations is accompanied by a short text caption that explains what is being illustrated in the diagram.  You can click here to download high resolution versions of the illustrations in a PowerPoint presentation with accompanying notes and/or click here to download the presenter script in PDF format.

We need your help to improve our efforts to teach the basics of water!   Please comment on what you like or don’t like about the graphics in our gallery.  If you don’t want your comment to be posted publicly on this site, feel free to write us directly at brichter@tnc.org.  We thank you in advance for your constructive suggestions.

Click on any of the images below to a see a larger version.

Slide 1

 

At the global level, about 104,700 Billion Cubic Meters (or BCM) of rain or snow falls on the land surface of our planet each year. Almost 2/3 of that water is quickly evaporated or used by plants, returning to the atmosphere as vapor. We call this water that is absorbed by the landscape ‘green water.’ This water sustains forests, grasslands, and other natural and cultivated landscapes, and the animals that depend on those habitats.

Another 25% of the rain or snow finds its way into rivers and lakes, before ultimately flowing into estuaries and oceans and then evaporating back up into the atmosphere. We call this water ‘surface water.’ This is the water that sustains freshwater plants and animals, and of course is very important to us as well.

The final 12% of the rain or snow finds its way into underground aquifers, and we call this ‘groundwater.’ This is the water that we pump from wells or emerges from springs to supply our streams. Much of this water, too, finds its way to the ocean, either through rivers or by seeping into the ocean from coastal aquifers.

We call the combined surface water and groundwater ‘blue water’, and it makes up a total of about 37% of all the rain and snow in the global cycle. This blue water is of great value to our lives and our economic production.

So how do we use all this water? And how much of it do we use?

Slide 2

On a global basis, we use about 5% of all the green water flow for rainfed agriculture. We also benefit from green water by harvesting products such as timber from forests, grazing animals that feed on grasslands, etc.

Slide 3

We also extract a significant amount of blue water for our use, both from surface water (rivers and lakes) and groundwater. This is what hydrologists mean by water WITHDRAWALS, i.e., the act of withdrawing water from the annual flows of blue water. If you look to the left side of the diagram, where the pink flows are pulled out from the blue water flows, you can see that we withdraw almost 3,000 BCM of surface water and a little more than 1,000 BCM of groundwater each year. This is equivalent to 4% of the total volume of rain and snow falling each year.

We use that blue water for all kinds of purposes. For irrigation. For cooling our electrical plants. For drinking and sanitation. For industrial processes. Once we’re done using it, one of two things happens to the water. It either evaporates to the atmosphere or it flows back into rivers and lakes, where it is potentially available for other uses before it finds its way to the ocean and evaporates, eventually falling back to earth as rain or snow.

If you look on the right of this diagram, you can see that hydrologists refer to these two different paths that blue water can take after we use it as CONSUMPTION or RETURN flow. Consumption means that we consumed the water by evaporating it to the atmosphere. As a result, it’s no longer available to us in rivers and lakes. RETURNED water goes back to rivers and lakes, so it is still potentially available to us for other uses before it ends up in the ocean. Think of it this way: WITHDRAWALS – RETURNS = CONSUMPTION.

That’s the global water picture. All in all, we make direct use of 9% of annual rain and snow, about half of it in the form of green water used in rainfed agriculture, and about half in the form of blue water that we withdraw from rivers, lakes, and aquifers. Of all the blue water that we withdraw, about one quarter is CONSUMED through evaporation to the atmosphere, and the remaining three quarters or so is RETURNED to rivers and lakes. 36% of all the water falling from the sky onto the land surface eventually flows back to the ocean.

It’s worth noting that we usually don’t return water in the same condition, and sometimes not even at the same location, that we withdrew it. Sometimes we return it at a higher temperature, or with added chemicals or nutrients. All of these changes can affect the health of the rivers and lakes to which this water is returned, and its potential to be used again downstream.

Slide 4

If we now look at blue water exclusively, we see that we WITHDRAW about 10% of all available blue water but CONSUME only 3%.

Slide 5

We can categorize our blue water use by major types of human activity. Irrigated agriculture withdraws and consumes the most blue water (both surface and groundwater), followed by electricity, domestic water supply, and industrial uses.

If we zoom in on each, we can see more detail on the relative amounts that they withdraw, return, and consume. In the case of agricultural irrigation, a total of 1,700 BCM of blue water is withdrawn from surface and groundwater sources. Of this water, nearly half is returned and more than half is consumed. That is, it evaporates from the soil or is transpired by plants.

In the case of electricity, about 1,471 BCM of blue water is withdrawn for cooling purposes in thermoelectric power plants, almost entirely from surface water. Almost all of this water is returned to rivers and lakes, though often at a higher temperature than when it was withdrawn.

In the case of domestic water supply used in our homes and businesses, a total of 563 BCM of water is withdrawn from rivers, lakes, and groundwater sources. Of this, about 20% is consumed through evaporation to the atmosphere. The rest—about 80%—is returned to rivers, lakes, and groundwater, typically with some level of increased pollution.

In the case of industrial uses, about 285 BCM of water is withdrawn from rivers, lakes, and groundwater. About 85% of this water is returned to these sources, though often with some level of pollution.

Slide 6

Just as we can look at the global water cycle in this way, we can look at the annual cycle of water in a single river basin, such as the Colorado River Basin in the American West.

Every year, 65 Billion Cubic Meters (BCM) of rain and snow falls in the Colorado River Basin. In the absence of human use, nearly two-thirds of that water is absorbed by soil and taken up by plants as green water before being evaporated or transpired up into the atmosphere. Another 31% finds its way into rivers and lakes as surface water, and another 6% finds its way into underground rivers and aquifers as groundwater. Just as with the global water cycle, that blue water would have historically found its way into the oceans and evaporated back up into the atmosphere.

Slide 7

If we add human uses into the picture, things look MUCH different in the Colorado River Basin than they did for the global situation. In the Colorado River Basin, we withdraw all of the 24.1 BCM of blue water that flows into rivers, lakes and aquifers each year. In addition, we reuse another 6.2 BCM of water that is returned to rivers and streams after being used. What this means is that in most years, the Colorado River no longer reaches the ocean. We withdraw and consume all of the water before it gets there. This has had great consequences for freshwater plants and animals, and people that depend for their survival on fisheries in river’s delta.

Slide 8

If we focus only on our use of blue water in the Colorado River Basin, we see that irrigated agriculture withdraws and consumes by far the most blue water in this basin, accounting for 60% of all withdrawals and 53% of all consumption. Urban uses such as domestic water supply, industrial uses, and electricity account for a smaller portion, but they still collectively consume about 20% of all blue water. About 25% of water consumed goes to exports out of the river basin to cities such as Denver and Los Angeles. Evaporation from large reservoirs such as Lake Powell and Lake Mead is responsible for 13% of all consumption in the basin.

As the previous diagram showed, the total withdrawals of over 30 BCM is considerably more than the annual blue water flow of around 24 BCM, and this diagram makes clear how that is possible. Almost three quarters of all the surface water is withdrawn by agriculture, but about a third of that is returned to rivers and lakes. It may be polluted by fertilizers, pesticides, and salts, but it is still available in the system for use by other activities like domestic use or electrical plant cooling.

The Colorado River Basin is an extreme case, and it demonstrates well the importance of concepts like WITHDRAWALS and CONSUMPTION. The Colorado is a “water scarce” river basin because we consume so much of the available water.

One of our greatest challenges is finding ways to deliver the same quality of goods and services in the world’s water-scarce river basins without consuming so much of the valuable blue water. Thankfully, there is plenty of technology and sound approaches available to help us reduce our consumption. We can make improvements in every way that we use water, but because of the volume of water consumed in agriculture, we need to pay particular attention to ‘growing more crops with less drops.”

 

Comments

  1. Sons Of Anarchy dvd season 4
    http://www.wholesaledvdset.com/sons-of-anarchy-season-4-dvd-box-set-p-3867.html
    November 5, 2012, 10:36 pm

    It is really a nice and helpful piece of information. I

  2. Nandini
    Rishikesh, India
    September 30, 2012, 3:31 am

    How can we adapt these models to the Ganga River Basin? I think it would be an effective way to spread awareness on the critical challenges facing the rivers Ganga and Yamuna.

    Please also visit our website ganga@parmarth.com to learn more about we are and we welcome you to our world Ganga Family.

  3. Nandini
    Rishikesh, India
    September 30, 2012, 3:27 am

    This would be a wonderful way to teach people about the uses of the Ganga River Basin. Also a great way to illustrate how and why it has become over-extracted, polluted and over-exploited. How can we do this as soon as possible? Both the rivers Ganga and Yamuna need special attention today and this could be very helpful to do so.

  4. Manuchehr E.Babadi
    Iran
    September 28, 2012, 3:18 am

    Dear Gentleman
    I wish your safe and health for ever.
    It was the best the water current story. I would be appreciated if you have any the water story subject in respect with the Iran in this subject.
    Thanks and warmest Regards:
    Dr. Manuchehr E.Babadi

  5. Rebecca Esselman
    Ann Arbor, MI
    September 27, 2012, 2:34 pm

    I like the visuals and having the accompanying narrative. As a watershed council, education about the importance, role and flow of water through a system is a focus of our efforts. It helps build a basis for making reasoned decisions about water use. I feel we could use these diagrams as part of talks we give. One thing we struggle with when looking for outside resources we can utilize is that examples all tend to come from arid geographies– something that does not resonate with folks in Great Lakes states that see water everywhere. Adding to your library of specific examples will help make this series of figures useful to a wide range of folks.

    I will keep watching the progress!

  6. Ray Quay
    Arizona
    September 25, 2012, 6:44 pm

    I like the concept of using these flow diagrams. However they do have a tendency to suggest some things that are misleading. 1) They are a variation of a supply and demand budget, but suggest that there is a flow from one point (one use) to the next in a linear fashion. In some cases this is true, in others it is not. 2) it suggests that the strands are seperate except where braided. Actually water is returned by Soil and Plants and Ag and Urban and used by each other multiple times. 3) Groundwater is a bit forced into the concept. As water is consumed or used for surface envirionmental or irrigation, etc, it finds its way to groundwater, where it may be pumped and consumed or evntually spill to rivers and the ocean. But the flow suggest water only moves out of the GW strand, never in to or back into the strand..

    I think export of Colorado River to CA or CO is a bit misleading. It is consumed in remote locations, but it still used for agriculture and urban water.

  7. Rosemary
    Australia
    September 25, 2012, 4:02 pm

    I am very interested in the Colorado/Wyoming basin where I understand there is significant Coal Bed Methane Extraction. How much of the water extracted by mining is returned?

    • Brian Richter
      September 25, 2012, 4:12 pm

      Hello Rosemary,
      The answer will vary considerably from one mining site to another. In some places, much of the water used is cleaned and injected back into an underground aquifer. Sometimes the water is recycled and provided to other users, such as farmers. In other places much of the water evaporates and is thus lost from local use. The Pacific Institute in California recently published a good summary of water use in natural gas extraction that might be of interest: http://www.pacinst.org/reports/fracking/full_report.pdf

  8. Sabrina Birner
    September 25, 2012, 3:11 pm

    Hi Brian,

    great to see these, esp the colorado basin example, which really gives meaning to the model. There’s such a need for good materials to educate laypeople, business, and policymakers on water issues, it’s wonderful to see that you are involved with this important effort. I am curious to see next graphics! Will you combine them with something like cost curves to build public awareness of the costs & savings possible from different measures?

    The slides seem pitched at readers with at least a solid high school education (“transpire”, “estuaries”, “aquifers”, “precipitation” instead of “rain and snow” etc); will you also produce a simpler version? Also, “BCM” is abstract, how about comparing this to something people can visualize (bathtub, swimming pool, or something else more creative)?

    Often when speaking with non-specialists (neighbors, etc), I am asked “why should i conserve water if it just goes down the drain and back into the river?” A simple graphic answering that question for a lay audience could be useful to deepen understanding.

    Another common source of confusion is the notion that we are “running out of water.” Graphic 8 addresses that indirectly, perhaps you could have a graphic on specifically o this topic.

    From a presentation perspective, would it be helpful to have a set of water facts or FAQs, each of which would be illustrated by a graphic? For example, now you have slides entitled e.g. “Global annual water cycle: withdrawals and consumption,” which does not tell me anything about the conclusion(s) to be drawn from the slide.

    The graphics might benefit from some visual indication of pollution after the water is returned.

    I suppose you’ll be linking this up in some way with the water footprint concept?

    One parting thought: in general, people like to know “how does this relate to me” and “what can I do about the problem?”, so graphics that address these questions could be powerful for raising awareness at an individual level.

    keep up the great work!

    Sabrina
    ps – once these are done…., I hope you consider preparing a simpler version for school children (ie, the next generation of decision-makers!) .

  9. Nicole Silk
    Boulder, Colorado
    September 25, 2012, 2:40 pm

    The narrative really helps the graphics make sense, but the addition of a particular place / basin helps even more. Thanks for your good work on this – would love to see this done for all basins or be interactive so that anyone can collect the data and run the numbers themselves. From a conservationists perspective, knowing more about the specific sources of ‘consumption or withdrawal’ really helps target solutions.

    • Brian Richter
      September 25, 2012, 2:46 pm

      Thanks, Nicole, for the encouraging review. Jason and I are already talking about turning this framework into an automated system that anyone could use to draw similar diagrams for their “home watershed.” They would only need to collect or estimate the requisite input data. Stay tuned!

  10. David Rankin
    September 25, 2012, 1:39 pm

    Great work! The contrast between the “big picture” and Colorado basin is a wonderful illustration of how context matters for water.

    I hope that this team does more!

    USGS has completed some work like this for the Great Lakes. although tailored for a very narrow and technical audience. Have a look at their site:
    http://water.usgs.gov/wateravailability/greatlakes/
    or see the graphic excerpted in this report:
    http://www.glpf.org/sites/default/files/files/Healthy%20Waters%20Workshop%20Summary%20Report.pdf

    There are two things that I wish both efforts could show. First, the interplay of surface and groundwater. Most riverine flow in the Great Lakes begins as shallow groundwater. Second, illustrating the alterations to the pattern of flows would be very powerful. Both are (well) beyond my skill set, but I’m glad that you folks are working the issue!

    Well done and I can’t wait for more!

  11. Catherine Howells
    Portland, Oregon
    September 25, 2012, 10:25 am

    Horrah for your work! I teach a class on drining water at Portland State University. I teach it every term (4 times a year) and it is capacity every time. Students want to learn how their world works and they become champions for sprreading the word about water. I begin with the history of our local water source and distribution system and end with current challenges to water in the world. More universities and colleges should do this.