National Geographic
Menu

Did the Chesapeake Bay Turn the Corner in 2011?

2011 may go down in history as the turning point for the Chesapeake Bay.  The largest estuary in the United States, the Bay’s watershed includes almost 20 percent of the country’s Atlantic coast and produces an estimated 500 million pounds of seafood every year.

In many ways, unfortunately, the Chesapeake Bay is ground zero when looking at the environmental impact of our food production. Inundated by pollution from factory farms, as well as sewage treatment plants, vehicle exhaust and power plant emissions, the Bay’s reputation as a high quality source of crabs and seafood has suffered over the years.

As chicken replaced beef as the number once source of protein on American dinner plates, the number of chickens crammed into factory farms—agricultural operations raising chickens and other farm animals on an industrial scale—has skyrocketed.  According to Food & Water Watch, Maryland has six factory-farmed broiler chickens (those raised for meat, not eggs) for every one person in the state. Think that’s a lot? Delaware has 19 factory-farmed broiler chickens for every human resident of the state.

The pollution from these facilities has been especially difficult to control.  The chicken manure and their bedding is dried in large piles and then spread as fertilizer on nearby farm fields.  Unfortunately, the amount of waste far exceeds the capacity of the crops to absorb the nutrients, and every time it rains the excess runs off the fields into nearby streams and then flows into the Chesapeake Bay.

According to the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, the runoff from farm fields accounts for 40 percent of the nitrogen and 50 percent of the phosphorous entering the Bay. As the key nutrients in fertilizer, nitrogen and phosphorous promote plant growth everywhere—and in water, this means the growth of algae blooms that consume the oxygen in the water.

In centuries past, marine species known as “filter feeders” would consume the algae and other types of plankton, keeping the water clean.  These filter feeders include well-known species such as oysters and mostly unknown species such as Atlantic menhaden.  But while the runoff from factory farms has vastly increased the amount of food for the filter feeders, overfishing has decimated their populations.

Atlantic menhaden, for example, once existed in vast quantities so large that schools once stretched for dozens of miles. A small innocuous fish no more than a foot in length, it can eat the algae in more than four gallons of water every minute.  Menhaden are the food of choice for seabirds, whales and marine mammals, and predator fish like the striped bass, blue fish, bluefin tuna, king mackerel, and Atlantic tarpon.

Unfortunately, more menhaden are caught on the U.S. Eastern seaboard than any other species, even though they are not caught for food. Instead, more than three quarters of this catch is brought to a processing factory at the mouth of the Chesapeake where the fish are “reduced” to oil—for omega 3 fatty acid pills—as well as fertilizer, factory farm feed, pet food, lipstick, and other commercial products.

Atlantic menhaden image courtesy of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Scientists from the Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences looked at the number of menhaden thought to be in Chesapeake Bay and then examined the amount of algae thought to be growing in the Bay’s waters.  They concluded that there weren’t enough menhaden to slurp up all the algae, and their study was cited by the commercial fishing industry as proof that menhaden had a limited ecological role as it fought against efforts to lower its annual catch.

What has not been examined, however, is whether lowering the amount of nutrients in the water—and thus the amount of algae—while increasing the amount of menhaden would change the results.  And this is why 2011 has been such a landmark year.

In December, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency introduced new caps for the amount of nitrogen and phosphorous that can enter the Chesapeake Bay.  Promoted as a “pollution diet,” the new effort would reduce the amount of nitrogen entering the bay by 25 percent and the amount of phosphorous by 24 percent.  In 2011, advocates beat back repeated attempts in Congress to defund this effort, and draft implementation plans for this pollution diet have now been submitted by those states in the Bay watershed along with the District of Columbia.

Last month, the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission reacted to the most recent stock assessment for Atlantic menhaden and agreed that the amount of menhaden caught should be reduced by more than a third.  This action will leave more fish in the water to rebuild vastly depleted populations—and thus increase the capacity of the fish to clean more of the Bay’s waters.

It will take years for these developments to bear fruit, but the progress comes not a moment too soon.  While recent reports note that the dead zones in the Bay had been shrinking, this year’s dead zones were the largest ever.  In the end, however, if these initiatives are fully implemented, more fish and less pollution should add up to a cleaner Chesapeake Bay.

Dan Klotz is a veteran advocate and writer on conservation efforts and the health and sustainability of our food systems, from the mass production of farm animals and crops to the fishing of marine creatures large and small.

Dan’s career as an environmental and public health advocate has spanned a wide range of policy issues, including: protecting sharks around the world, reforming factory farms, advocating for smoke-free workplaces, cleaning up toxic waste sites, and preserving wild areas on land and in the ocean. He has worked at international meetings on five continents and has traveled to 14 countries and 38 states in the U.S.

Dan has more than 20 years of communications and public affairs experience, and is an expert in leveraging publicity to help propel public policy campaigns. He has led communications efforts at several multinational NGOs and has also consulted for a wide variety of non-governmental organizations. For more of his writing please visit dkcontent.net.

The views expressed in this guest blog are those of Dan Klotz and not necessarily those of National Geographic. Visitors are invited to add their views or comments, but they must respect our community rules, which means keeping the discussion civil and on topic. Posts or comments in violation of our rules will not be published.

Related post by Chef Barton Seaver: Saving This Small Fish Can Help Save the Ocean

Comments

  1. sarev nevresim takımları
    January 28, 2013, 8:01 am

    Great work! This is the kind of info that are meant to be shared across the internet. Shame on Google for now not positioning this put up higher! Come on over and visit my site . Thanks =)

  2. John Jenkinson
    Boston
    March 21, 2012, 1:29 pm

    How much OMEGA 3 from mehaden is used to feed chickens in the Bay?

  3. Debra
    USA
    February 26, 2012, 11:42 am

    Love the blog

  4. tenbroeck
    ATL
    January 12, 2012, 12:02 pm

    Great article, thanks.

  5. Hope For Striper Spawning Grounds
    January 5, 2012, 3:04 pm

    [...] quality.You can read more about Chesapeake Bay in this National Geographic guest post by Dan Klotz, Did the Chesapeake Bay Turn the Corner in 2011?   Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required [...]